|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A new keyword to an object , antialias off, or no_antialias would fit
nice.
//Spider
Bob Hughes wrote:
>
> Yeah, antialiasing would be greatly improved upon if it could be limited
> to specified, or excluded from certain parts of a scene.
> The amount of depth, +R3 default, matters a great deal as many already
> know. More improves singular point "seeing", yet less depth allows for
> less smudging.
> Any votes for selective antialiasing? Or has this vote been balloted
> before...?
>
> Ken wrote:
> >
> > The anti aliasing
> > really threw me for a loop. It wiped out a lot of the reflected
> > firework light on the water. Had to add some cheater light sources
> > to get the reflected colors seen in this image. AA also wipes out
> > star fields. Anybody else notice this ?
> >
> > --
> > Ken Tyler
> >
> > tyl### [at] pacbellnet
>
> --
> omniVERSE: beyond the universe
> http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
> =Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Please accept my humble apologies :)
Spider wrote:
>
> Actually, I am a male and it was a typo.
> :-)
> (I don't have THAT bad grammar, but almost.)
>
> //Spider
>
> Bob Hughes wrote:
> >
> > This right? he's a she? Or just another typo, Ms. Spider?
> >
> > Spider wrote:
> > >
> > > > for Spider. That is if he even wants it.
> > > Yes, her really wants it..
> > >
> > > //Spider
> >
> > --
> > omniVERSE: beyond the universe
> > http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
> > =Bob
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
=Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Spider schrieb in Nachricht <36B3BE2E.DAFFDF44@bahnhof.se>...
>And how many people celebrate the last of april ??
>
Approx. 15 millions of them (this is Queen's Day in Holland).
Yes, I know... but a late reply is better than no reply.
--
Rudy Velthuis
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
hehe, Add sweden then... Very big feast here.
//Spider
Rudy Velthuis wrote:
>
> Spider schrieb in Nachricht <36B3BE2E.DAFFDF44@bahnhof.se>...
> >And how many people celebrate the last of april ??
> >
> Approx. 15 millions of them (this is Queen's Day in Holland).
>
> Yes, I know... but a late reply is better than no reply.
> --
> Rudy Velthuis
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Or maybe set it to antialias everywhere but the edges (good for images with
transparency)
"Spider" <spi### [at] bahnhofse> wrote in message
news:36B48305.821EA69E@bahnhof.se...
> A new keyword to an object , antialias off, or no_antialias would fit
> nice.
>
> //Spider
>
> Bob Hughes wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, antialiasing would be greatly improved upon if it could be limited
> > to specified, or excluded from certain parts of a scene.
> > The amount of depth, +R3 default, matters a great deal as many already
> > know. More improves singular point "seeing", yet less depth allows for
> > less smudging.
> > Any votes for selective antialiasing? Or has this vote been balloted
> > before...?
> >
> > Ken wrote:
> > >
> > > The anti aliasing
> > > really threw me for a loop. It wiped out a lot of the reflected
> > > firework light on the water. Had to add some cheater light sources
> > > to get the reflected colors seen in this image. AA also wipes out
> > > star fields. Anybody else notice this ?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ken Tyler
> > >
> > > tyl### [at] pacbellnet
> >
> > --
> > omniVERSE: beyond the universe
> > http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
> > =Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mahalis wrote:
>
> > > > The anti aliasing
> > > > really threw me for a loop. It wiped out a lot of the reflected
> > > > firework light on the water. Had to add some cheater light sources
> > > > to get the reflected colors seen in this image. AA also wipes out
> > > > star fields.
This was three years ago but as we now know this is because colors
are clipped before aa and also DOF calculations. They don't need to
be clipped. 100% is not the maximum incoming light intensity in the
virtual povray camera. The 100% limit is only in the virtual film
which records the incoming light.
_________________________________
Kari Kivisalo - http://LuxLab.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |