 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Saturday night doodle. - Buddha01c1_.jpg (1/1) - Buddha03c2_0000.jpg
Date: 22 Oct 2008 10:56:52
Message: <48ff3f34@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> schreef in bericht
news:d4ttf4lv3r8c6g4pu5kcv17guu773nmtc2@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:06:22 +0100, Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote:
>
> I've managed to create a fade but it looks a bit cylindrical to my eyes.
> The
> floor still needs a bit of work.
>
Better!
Could you do a fade that would take up, say, 1/4 of each image?
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Buddha03c2_0000.jpg' (1 KB)
Download 'Buddha03c5_.jpg' (310 KB)
Preview of image 'Buddha03c5_.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Saturday night doodle. - Buddha01c1_.jpg (1/1) - Buddha03c2_0000.jpg - Buddha03c5_.jpg
Date: 22 Oct 2008 22:12:59
Message: <48ffddab@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The green status looks much more 3D to me than the gold one in this
setting. The scene really looks kind of ... flat, overall.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Saturday night doodle. - Buddha01c1_.jpg (1/1) - Buddha03c2_0000.jpg - Buddha03c5_.jpg
Date: 23 Oct 2008 03:25:10
Message: <490026d6$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> schreef in bericht
news:g2lvf45guv6d9tqfaareesf0nsf2j9devv@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:56:51 +0200, "Thomas de Groot"
> <t.d### [at] inter nlDOTnet>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Could you do a fade that would take up, say, 1/4 of each image?
>>
> That was more difficult than I thought it would be. My maths gland has
> gone on
> strike + a problem with Beta 29 and me trying to be clever with r.g.b
> values in
> reflections.
> --
Bravo! as far as the ground is concerned, that looks much better. Could you
do the same for the background?
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Buddha03c5_.jpg' (1 KB)
Download 'Buddha03d2_.jpg' (78 KB)
Preview of image 'Buddha03d2_.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Saturday night doodle. - Buddha01c1_.jpg (1/1) - Buddha03c2_0000.jpg - Buddha03c5_.jpg - Buddha03d2_.jpg
Date: 24 Oct 2008 03:27:07
Message: <490178cb$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> schreef in bericht
news:8og0g4l726spv0mdl59nmcg4esj0rfbg92@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:25:12 +0200, "Thomas de Groot"
> <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>Bravo! as far as the ground is concerned, that looks much better. Could
>>you
>>do the same for the background?
>
> Yes Sir :-)
hmm hmm hmm.... Still a little boundary line visible on the day side, but
that's the idea indeed!!
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Jim Charter
Subject: Re: Saturday night doodle. - Buddha01c1_.jpg (1/1)
Date: 1 Nov 2008 01:46:17
Message: <490bed29@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:44:19 -0400, Jim Charter <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote:
>
>
>>You might try a 'splicing' border with fragments of the images
>>interleaved to produce the transition.
>>
>>Or...rather than a graded transition, just some sort of framing. I
>>think the blunt edges abutted is part of the problem.
>
>
> I'm not too sure what you mean, Jim.
> I'm working on the sky first, rewriting the code for the stars. {I'm using a
> modeller and having 3000 stars as 3000 objects was slowing it down a bit. (Beta
> testing and you have to push the limits :)} After getting the day sky to blend
> in with the night sky I'll look at the plane.
> So how would I splice the images on the floor? I'm thinking along the lines of
> your mosaic table and can't imagine how it could be done.
> The framing is a good idea as well especially since the North - South faces
> don't match up.
Sorry I never got back to this, finally forced myself to take a break
from work and relax a bit. I guess I didn't describe what I meant very
well.
Here are two examples of what I meant for posible transitions that are
"spliced" as I tried to describe it rather than a smooth fade. (I think
the smooth fade that Thomas suggested and you have managed so far is
quite effective, btw.) Each of these examples is arrived at differently
and probably rather crudely but my larger point is that there is not a
single answer to either look or method to what I meant. I am just
popping an image_map in to stand for the night v day backgrounds you
have. If you are rendering them directly of course, each of the methods
I use here could be resolved into a pigment_pattern which could then be
used with MegaPOV's camera pigment.
I'll put the SDL on p.b.scene-files
As for the floor I'll noodle on it a bit further
-Jim
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download '1.png' (334 KB)
Download '2.png' (307 KB)
Preview of image '1.png'
Preview of image '2.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
