POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : marbles - [16-bit JPEG2000] Server Time
12 Aug 2024 07:21:20 EDT (-0400)
  marbles - [16-bit JPEG2000] (Message 71 to 80 of 83)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 3 Messages >>>
From: IMBJR
Subject: Re: jpg version
Date: 8 Mar 2004 16:55:32
Message: <1sjp40dilmm3a3v7bvas5si41ji7ggiafj@4ax.com>
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 09:00:15 -0600, "GreyBeard" <r.b### [at] sbcglobalnet>
wrote:

>that.  While my other machines have 64 and 128 meg graphic cards, this one
>has a Diamond Stealth, and I don't deem internet use worthy of anything
>higher.  (And before you come up with the normal puke, such as "ludite" or
>some such other stupid term, I suggest you email blank checks before telling
>me that I should "upgrade" this box.)

You presume too much. Think again.

>
>Just accept that you're using an oddball format and that expecting everyone
>else to be able to decode, or even recognize that it's there is rather
>stupid.

Well, duh. Any other stunning revelations for us?

And I do not expect everyone to view them. I have merely pointed out
how they can - if the platform allows it.

>
>Oh, BTW, windows bitmap format, and my printer being capable of 1200 DPI, I
>like to be able to push the output to the limits of the printer.  I'm also
>fond of printing to the full 11 X 17 that the printer is capable of too.  I
>could go 13 X 19 but the paper is too hard to find.

Who cares!? Another one trying to change the subject.

>
>You aren't going to change the world, junior.  It may change, but probably
>not at your hand.

Dear me. Where on Earth you get such inflated views? Try cutting down
on the hyperbole and try thinking straight.

>

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com


Post a reply to this message

From: IMBJR
Subject: Re: jpg version
Date: 8 Mar 2004 16:55:34
Message: <t1kp401nrg0n6ksa52a8je4ffnqjoc86ul@4ax.com>
On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 13:16:45 +0100, ABX <abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote:

>On Sat, 06 Mar 2004 19:24:21 +0000, IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> wrote:
>> > Fine. I don't wish to download images you don't want me to see. *plonk*
>>
>> Go on, hide under a shell.
>
>From the fact that you can install everything on your machine how do you
>conclude that it is easy/possible for everyone ?

I don't. As usual, your conclusions are in error.

>
>I'm really impreessed by your obstinacy to be not user-friendly to users of
>your images.

No you are not. You are quick to lie and this is merely just another
token of the malaise to be found here.

>
>ABX

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com


Post a reply to this message

From: IMBJR
Subject: Re: jpg version
Date: 8 Mar 2004 16:55:35
Message: <i3kp40h146e3jvlc6k2p546b2cf01mhnli@4ax.com>
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 09:13:07 -0600, "GreyBeard" <r.b### [at] sbcglobalnet>
wrote:

>
>"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
>news:gj9n40h76tm8sn3l8lqsf3vutoog0v5bon@4ax.com...
>>
>> Sorry you have such a very narrow of such an expressive language.
>>
>Would you like to learn how expressive 44 years in a factory can make the
>language?  Sorry dud, but I know some women that could show you how
>expressive it can really be, and how graphic the mental pictures can be.

Well woopie! You know a woman that can swear. Well so what? Does that
make you feel somehow special?

>
>I don't think I'm alone, but your attitude has told me that you don't post
>anything worth making me go through a bunch of hoops to see.  A leader of
>men, or a pacesetter, you are not.

What is wrong with you people that you resort to such hyperbole so
easily?

>

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com


Post a reply to this message

From: ABX
Subject: Re: jpg version
Date: 9 Mar 2004 02:56:52
Message: <7stq40130gob69n4llurtp5csgano2m426@4ax.com>
On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 22:00:30 +0000, IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> wrote:
> > From the fact that you can install everything on your machine how do you
> > conclude that it is easy/possible for everyone ?
>
> I don't. As usual, your conclusions are in error.

You are welcome to give me references to all my wrong conclusions and a ratio
wrong/right conclusions in list of all 6 years of my posting to this server.

followup setup

ABX


Post a reply to this message

From: scott
Subject: Re: marbles - [16-bit JPEG2000]
Date: 9 Mar 2004 04:13:42
Message: <404d8ac6$1@news.povray.org>
IMBJR wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:18:50 -0000, "scott" <sco### [at] spamcom> wrote:
>
>> IMBJR wrote:
>>> On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 21:00:03 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dan P wrote:
>>>>> Until Microsoft builds an image format into their browser, it
>>>>> doesn't stand a chance. Behold, the power of M$!
>>>>
>>>> Paint Shop Pro supports it. $50 for a very nice photo editting
>>>> program.
>>>>
>>>> Was it supposed to be greyscale, or is PSP's support broken? :-)
>>>
>>> Try this at 8-bit.
>>
>> Still grey.  Just post a normal JPEG if you want us to see it!
>
> Really. Blimey, you need some updates then I reckon.

Yeah you're probably right.  I've been looking for something to replace OE
with for a while (it annoys me sometimes), can you recommend something?


Post a reply to this message

From: scott
Subject: Re: marbles - [16-bit JPEG2000]
Date: 9 Mar 2004 12:50:42
Message: <404e03f2@news.povray.org>
For everyone's information, this is a screenshot of what it loads up like on
my PC :-)

Couldn't get the 16-bit version to work, although I suspect it would have
looked identical.


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'marbles.jpg' (27 KB)

Preview of image 'marbles.jpg'
marbles.jpg


 

From: IMBJR
Subject: Re: marbles - [16-bit JPEG2000]
Date: 9 Mar 2004 16:31:30
Message: <sa9s40ddg9h2hke6cl121plsg079a6f0uk@4ax.com>
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:13:38 -0000, "scott" <sco### [at] spamcom> wrote:

>IMBJR wrote:
>> On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:18:50 -0000, "scott" <sco### [at] spamcom> wrote:
>>
>>> IMBJR wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 21:00:03 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dan P wrote:
>>>>>> Until Microsoft builds an image format into their browser, it
>>>>>> doesn't stand a chance. Behold, the power of M$!
>>>>>
>>>>> Paint Shop Pro supports it. $50 for a very nice photo editting
>>>>> program.
>>>>>
>>>>> Was it supposed to be greyscale, or is PSP's support broken? :-)
>>>>
>>>> Try this at 8-bit.
>>>
>>> Still grey.  Just post a normal JPEG if you want us to see it!
>>
>> Really. Blimey, you need some updates then I reckon.
>
>Yeah you're probably right.  I've been looking for something to replace OE
>with for a while (it annoys me sometimes), can you recommend something?

Forte Agent is my news tool of choice. That coupled with Infranview.

>

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com


Post a reply to this message

From: IMBJR
Subject: Re: marbles - [16-bit JPEG2000]
Date: 9 Mar 2004 16:31:31
Message: <gd9s409f0mf50t1vuqb9lk5bp04ivpt0f3@4ax.com>
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:50:37 -0000, "scott" <sco### [at] spamcom> wrote:

>For everyone's information, this is a screenshot of what it loads up like on
>my PC :-)
>
>Couldn't get the 16-bit version to work, although I suspect it would have
>looked identical.

Though this is a screenshot, please do not repost my work in a format
it was not intended for.

>
>

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com


Post a reply to this message

From: ABX
Subject: Re: marbles - [16-bit JPEG2000]
Date: 10 Mar 2004 05:01:45
Message: <4spt40pp1p9nos88e7ianv90t6bp0knpv4@4ax.com>
On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 21:36:28 +0000, IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> wrote:
> > Couldn't get the 16-bit version to work, although I suspect it would have
> > looked identical.
>
> Though this is a screenshot, please do not repost my work in a format
> it was not intended for.

In other format it would not be possible to see it with
http://news.povray.org/digest/images/

ABX


Post a reply to this message

From: IMBJR
Subject: Re: marbles - [16-bit JPEG2000]
Date: 10 Mar 2004 15:06:53
Message: <fgtu40d09r9jv782clmpt0r9n8cee6qt78@4ax.com>
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:02:44 +0100, ABX <abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote:

>On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 21:36:28 +0000, IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> wrote:
>> > Couldn't get the 16-bit version to work, although I suspect it would have
>> > looked identical.
>>
>> Though this is a screenshot, please do not repost my work in a format
>> it was not intended for.
>
>In other format it would not be possible to see it with
>http://news.povray.org/digest/images/

Try downloading it from usenet instead and viewing it via a
third-party viewer.

>
>ABX

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 3 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.