 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"IMBJR" <no### [at] spam here> wrote in message
news:1qbf4053e0q04qifcrt7nts9avefvo5egk@4ax.com...
Unusual aspect ratio but looks right for this simple scene. I love
glass objects and I love these marbles.
Viewed with IrfanView 3.80, but not OE 6.0 or PSPro 7.
Alf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, that was actually worth scrolling down for. Thanks for the
translation, Shay, and thanks for the image, IMBJR.
Although, yesterday, when shopping at a discount store, I noticed
something very disturbing. The marbles they had for sale there were all
clear (internally), with the designs painted on the surface (shudder!)
Dave Matthews
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 21:00:03 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
wrote:
>Dan P wrote:
>> Until Microsoft builds an image format into their browser, it doesn't stand
>> a chance. Behold, the power of M$!
>
>Paint Shop Pro supports it. $50 for a very nice photo editting program.
>
>Was it supposed to be greyscale, or is PSP's support broken? :-)
Try this at 8-bit.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'marbles_8bit.jp2' (99 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 04:03:44 -0700, "Jason F. Kowalski"
<jfk### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote
>
>What's the point of posting in JPEG2000?
In this case, preservation of the 16-bit output of POV.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 04:03:44 -0700, "Jason F. Kowalski"
<jfk### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote
>
>What's the point of posting in JPEG2000?
>
>Huge majority (incl I) doesn't have a viewer.
>
PS. There's also 16-bit PNG, but in this case I chose JPEG2000.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 09:56:32 -0600, Dave Matthews
<dma### [at] nospamnet> wrote:
>Well, that was actually worth scrolling down for. Thanks for the
>translation, Shay, and thanks for the image, IMBJR.
>
>Although, yesterday, when shopping at a discount store, I noticed
>something very disturbing. The marbles they had for sale there were all
>clear (internally), with the designs painted on the surface (shudder!)
Oh my god, what has the world come to? Marbles are almost a joy to
look at; if they are merely painted. WTF.
>
>Dave Matthews
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 08:58:17 -0600, "Shay" <sah### [at] simcopartscom> wrote:
>
>"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
>news:1qbf4053e0q04qifcrt7nts9avefvo5egk@4ax.com...
>
Whilst I appreciate the idea behind reposting the image in standard
JPEG format, you have only succeeded in introducing artifacts and a
drop in colour-depth. The end result is a defacing of my original
posting.
Please don't do this in the future. How would you like it if I took
your postings and reposted then as 4 colour GIFs or worse?
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
news:3eoh40p2s9jd1t8o03thoj1iv5i4jo12b0@4ax.com...
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'bouquet.gif' (16 KB)
Preview of image 'bouquet.gif'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
news:3eoh40p2s9jd1t8o03thoj1iv5i4jo12b0@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 08:58:17 -0600, "Shay" <sah### [at] simcopartscom> wrote:
>
> Whilst I appreciate the idea behind reposting the image in standard
> JPEG format, you have only succeeded in introducing artifacts and a
> drop in colour-depth. The end result is a defacing of my original
> posting.
>
> Please don't do this in the future. How would you like it if I took
> your postings and reposted then as 4 colour GIFs or worse?
FWIW, Most people aren't even going to be able to see the difference in the
16bit/Component color as opposed to 8bit/C color. So, why not just post it
as a standard jpg and save people who may not be compatible with a lesser
known format.
I don't necessarily think the posting of a standard JPG is nearly as bad as
posting a "4 colour GIF". People use a wide variety of OSes on these groups
(remember, POV-Ray is multi-platform), some may not have access to tools to
view a JPEG2000 file.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
news:3eoh40p2s9jd1t8o03thoj1iv5i4jo12b0@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 08:58:17 -0600, "Shay" <sah### [at] simcopartscom>
wrote:
>
> >
> >"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
> >news:1qbf4053e0q04qifcrt7nts9avefvo5egk@4ax.com...
> >
>
> Whilst I appreciate the idea behind reposting the image in standard
> JPEG format, you have only succeeded in introducing artifacts and a
> drop in colour-depth. The end result is a defacing of my original
> posting.
>
> Please don't do this in the future. How would you like it if I took
> your postings and reposted then as 4 colour GIFs or worse?
You have a fair point, but at the end of the day Imjer, we want to
see an image, not *hunt* for the damned thing!
Heh, I tried... and failed... ;)
I understand your point of view, but you could have easily
explained what you wanted to achieve, and post a link for a webpage
somewhere - I am aware that you can do this, so there's no excuse on
your part.
It's Friday evening, have a drink on me. :o)
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
