 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
But not much. As you can see, the sun is now a MP+ glow. It was a sphere
with a light inside using light_groups. And I know some of the platforms
aren't centered on the petrified trees.
*Sorry*.
:)
Oh, and the trees have been changed to julia fractals. Do the look any
better?
--
H.E. Day
<><
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'sky3.jpg' (36 KB)
Preview of image 'sky3.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"H. E. Day" wrote:
>
> But not much. As you can see, the sun is now a MP+ glow. It was a sphere
> with a light inside using light_groups. And I know some of the platforms
> aren't centered on the petrified trees.
> *Sorry*.
> :)
> Oh, and the trees have been changed to julia fractals. Do the look any
> better?
It's hard to say, the JPEG compression shreds the detail.
Are there supposed to be two suns here? I think I preferred it with just one...
-Xplo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <01c0235e$fe47f300$957889d0@daysix>, "H. E. Day"
<Pov### [at] aol com> wrote:
> But not much. As you can see, the sun is now a MP+ glow.
I hope you meant the "suns", as in two of them...because that thing on
the horizon is either a second sun or a thermonuclear blast.
Fascinating image anyway...julia fractal trees? I would never have
thought of that...I can't figure out how to control julias.
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oooohh... Who needs Lightflow when you've got POV glows? :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"H. E. Day" wrote:
> But not much. As you can see, the sun is now a MP+ glow. It was a sphere
> with a light inside using light_groups. And I know some of the platforms
> aren't centered on the petrified trees.
I think if you're gonna keep this industiralized version the color contrast
needs work. The sky seems a tad melonish in color, and those greens and
oranges on the ground don't seem to mix well though I'm sure jpeg made it ten
times worse.
> Oh, and the trees have been changed to julia fractals. Do the look any
> better?
Hard to say. I'm leaning towards the old ones though.
Hmm, need some praise too... looks nice and stuff... yeah that'll do.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
For some reason I prefere the first image that you posted (9/17), but with
some fine tuning, this one is very good, too. I think I liked the first one
because it looked so desolate.
-Dave
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000 20:17:35 -0500, Chris Huff wrote:
>
>Fascinating image anyway...julia fractal trees? I would never have
>thought of that...I can't figure out how to control julias.
Me either, and it's information I could use... I'm married to one.
--
Ron Parker http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions. Mine. Not anyone else's.
Proudly not helping RIAA and SDMI steal my rights --
http://www.eff.org/Misc/EFF/Newsletters/EFFector/HTML/effect13.08.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ron Parker schrieb in Nachricht ...
>Me either, and it's information I could use... I'm married to one.
>
A fractal or a Julia?
Marc-Hendrik
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000 19:16:24 +0200, Marc-Hendrik Bremer wrote:
>
>Ron Parker schrieb in Nachricht ...
>
>>Me either, and it's information I could use... I'm married to one.
>>
>
>
>A fractal or a Julia?
A Julie, actually, but close enough that the technique for controlling
Julias might work.
--
Ron Parker http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions. Mine. Not anyone else's.
Proudly not helping RIAA and SDMI steal my rights --
http://www.eff.org/Misc/EFF/Newsletters/EFFector/HTML/effect13.08.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
