 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/12/2018 01:53 PM, Kenneth wrote:
> "Kontemplator" <haf### [at] yahoo com> wrote:
Your own video-- as uploaded to the newsgroups-- shows up here as
>
> jk_povtons_01_preview.mp4.mpg
Thunderbird/Ubuntu, I see the file as .mp4 . No extra .mpg extension.
Weird that the web site adds an extra extension.
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.animations/thread/%3Cweb.5a57ebc9274166f7ec26c2ae0%40news.povray.org%3E/
--
dik
Rendered 344576 of 345600 pixels (99%)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11-1-2018 23:57, Kontemplator wrote:
> Here is just a quick overview what i plan for these year. Only 50 weeks left and
> so much empty space in the room. Hope my inspiration keeps in good mood.
>
Am I correct when I say that I only see a black screen through the whole
"animation"?
You guys have made me confused ;-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13/01/2018 07:47, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 11-1-2018 23:57, Kontemplator wrote:
>> Here is just a quick overview what i plan for these year. Only 50
>> weeks left and
>> so much empty space in the room. Hope my inspiration keeps in good mood.
>>
>
> Am I correct when I say that I only see a black screen through the whole
> "animation"?
>
No there is more than that.
In Tbird I can view the animation directly but it will not save. I see
it named jk_povtons_01_preview.mp4
On the website I see it named jk_povtons_01_preview.mp4.mpg
It downloads and plays directly using MPC-HC (My default player.) It
does not play with Windows Media Player even when removing the ".mpg"
It is a good start and worth the effort.
Kontemplator
BTW in the animation between 12 & 13 seconds. There is a change in the
black and yellow striped material.
> You guys have made me confused ;-)
>
Confused with what/whom? ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> Kontemplator
> BTW in the animation between 12 & 13 seconds. There is a change in the
> black and yellow striped material.
Yes - it's like the frequency of the stripes get increased for some reason.
> > You guys have made me confused ;-)
Don't blame us.
It's either a conscious choice on your part, or you were born that way.
No trying to imply that it's the result of some sort of POV-user social
construct.
And always you two with the negativity. First there's Stephen with his negative
light sources, and now you with your con-fusion.
I've always been pro-fusion myself, and really, with all the new discoveries
involving graphene, there are some alternatives and with the implications of
quantum entangled gravity, we may just find a way around that pesky
Lennard-Jones potential.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>
> > Kontemplator
> > BTW in the animation between 12 & 13 seconds. There is a change in the
> > black and yellow striped material.
>
> Yes - it's like the frequency of the stripes get increased for some reason.
>
It's only a preview. After repainting the walls I had to adjust the stripes.
Maybe I don't do that again, while rendering the final version.
have a nice weekend
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13/01/2018 13:09, Bald Eagle wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>
>> Kontemplator
>> BTW in the animation between 12 & 13 seconds. There is a change in the
>> black and yellow striped material.
>
> Yes - it's like the frequency of the stripes get increased for some reason.
>
>>> You guys have made me confused ;-)
>
> Don't blame us.
> It's either a conscious choice on your part, or you were born that way.
> No trying to imply that it's the result of some sort of POV-user social
> construct.
>
Well don't confuse me (with someone who gives a damn). ;-)
> And always you two with the negativity. First there's Stephen with his negative
> light sources,
I've always been a bit of a sook. :-)
> and now you with your con-fusion.
> I've always been pro-fusion myself, and really, with all the new discoveries
> involving graphene, there are some alternatives and with the implications of
> quantum entangled gravity, we may just find a way around that pesky
> Lennard-Jones potential.
>
>
Is that really such a good idea? Wouldn't it mean that we would fall
through the floor and end up as a black hole?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13/01/2018 13:31, Kontemplator wrote:
> "Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
>> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>>
>>> Kontemplator
>>> BTW in the animation between 12 & 13 seconds. There is a change in the
>>> black and yellow striped material.
>>
>> Yes - it's like the frequency of the stripes get increased for some reason.
>>
> It's only a preview. After repainting the walls I had to adjust the stripes.
> Maybe I don't do that again, while rendering the final version.
>
:-D
> have a nice weekend
>
>
>
And yourself.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> Well don't confuse me (with someone who gives a damn). ;-)
I won't. I'll just fuse you and wait until you head explodes. :D
> I've always been a bit of a sook. :-)
LOL. I had to look up that little bit of colloquial jargon.
> Is that really such a good idea? Wouldn't it mean that we would fall
> through the floor and end up as a black hole?
I'm not sure what it would mean except change of such a scale that most of the
world wouldn't know what to do with it.
We're looking for The Monolith, and there's no telling what will happen once we
find it.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13/01/2018 14:41, Bald Eagle wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>
>> Well don't confuse me (with someone who gives a damn). ;-)
>
> I won't. I'll just fuse you and wait until you head explodes. :D
>
Been there, done that. People just think I'm smoking a "funny" cigarette. :)
>
>> I've always been a bit of a sook. :-)
>
> LOL. I had to look up that little bit of colloquial jargon.
>
Yes, suck as in suck up. Either light or affection. :)
>
>> Is that really such a good idea? Wouldn't it mean that we would fall
>> through the floor and end up as a black hole?
>
>
> I'm not sure what it would mean except change of such a scale that most of the
> world wouldn't know what to do with it.
>
If the world were still there. I'm thinking more of the repulsive force.
> We're looking for The Monolith, and there's no telling what will happen once we
> find it.
>
Again do we want to? I'm thinking along the lines of an alarm that
announces that the rats have escaped from their cage.
Which reminds me of a very simple alarm system I saw once. I was working
in Taronga Zoo a couple of decades ago. I got a back room tour around
the monkey enclosure. Just as you came to the outer door there was a
small window with a banana on the inside ledge. If the banana was not
there then there was a very good chance that a monkey had escaped from
the inner enclosure and eaten the fruit. Simpler and cheaper than an
electronic alarm.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>
> Am I correct when I say that I only see a black screen through the whole
> "animation"?
>
Hmm.
Step #1:
Turn on computer monitor.
Step #2.....
:-P
I have no idea what might be going on; in Windows Media Player, the downloaded
video doesn't start playing at all (so I use an alternate app.) A black screen
*while* the video plays is a mystery.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
