Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:

> Kontemplator
> BTW in the animation between 12 & 13 seconds. There is a change in the
> black and yellow striped material.

Yes - it's like the frequency of the stripes get increased for some reason.

> > You guys have made me confused ;-)

Don't blame us.
It's either a conscious choice on your part, or you were born that way.
No trying to imply that it's the result of some sort of POV-user social
construct.

And always you two with the negativity.  First there's Stephen with his negative
light sources, and now you with your con-fusion.
I've always been pro-fusion myself, and really, with all the new discoveries
involving graphene, there are some alternatives and with the implications of
quantum entangled gravity, we may just find a way around that pesky
Lennard-Jones potential.

Post a reply to this message

"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>
> > Kontemplator
> > BTW in the animation between 12 & 13 seconds. There is a change in the
> > black and yellow striped material.
>
> Yes - it's like the frequency of the stripes get increased for some reason.
>
It's only a preview. After repainting the walls I had to adjust the stripes.
Maybe I don't do that again, while rendering the final version.

have a nice weekend

Post a reply to this message

On 13/01/2018 13:09, Bald Eagle wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> 
>> Kontemplator
>> BTW in the animation between 12 & 13 seconds. There is a change in the
>> black and yellow striped material.
> 
> Yes - it's like the frequency of the stripes get increased for some reason.
> 
>>> You guys have made me confused ;-)
> 
> Don't blame us.
> It's either a conscious choice on your part, or you were born that way.
> No trying to imply that it's the result of some sort of POV-user social
> construct.
> 

Well don't confuse me (with someone who gives a damn). ;-)


> And always you two with the negativity.  First there's Stephen with his negative
> light sources, 

I've always been a bit of a sook. :-)

> and now you with your con-fusion.
> I've always been pro-fusion myself, and really, with all the new discoveries
> involving graphene, there are some alternatives and with the implications of
> quantum entangled gravity, we may just find a way around that pesky
> Lennard-Jones potential.
> 
> 

Is that really such a good idea? Wouldn't it mean that we would fall 
through the floor and end up as a black hole?


-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 13/01/2018 13:31, Kontemplator wrote:
> "Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
>> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>>
>>> Kontemplator
>>> BTW in the animation between 12 & 13 seconds. There is a change in the
>>> black and yellow striped material.
>>
>> Yes - it's like the frequency of the stripes get increased for some reason.
>>
> It's only a preview. After repainting the walls I had to adjust the stripes.
> Maybe I don't do that again, while rendering the final version.
> 

:-D

> have a nice weekend
> 
> 
> 
And yourself.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:

> Well don't confuse me (with someone who gives a damn). ;-)

I won't.  I'll just fuse you and wait until you head explodes.  :D


> I've always been a bit of a sook. :-)

LOL.   I had to look up that little bit of colloquial jargon.


> Is that really such a good idea? Wouldn't it mean that we would fall
> through the floor and end up as a black hole?


I'm not sure what it would mean except change of such a scale that most of the
world wouldn't know what to do with it.

We're looking for The Monolith, and there's no telling what will happen once we
find it.

Post a reply to this message

On 13/01/2018 14:41, Bald Eagle wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> 
>> Well don't confuse me (with someone who gives a damn). ;-)
> 
> I won't.  I'll just fuse you and wait until you head explodes.  :D
> 

Been there, done that. People just think I'm smoking a "funny" cigarette. :)

> 
>> I've always been a bit of a sook. :-)
> 
> LOL.   I had to look up that little bit of colloquial jargon.
> 

Yes, suck as in suck up. Either light or affection. :)

> 
>> Is that really such a good idea? Wouldn't it mean that we would fall
>> through the floor and end up as a black hole?
> 
> 
> I'm not sure what it would mean except change of such a scale that most of the
> world wouldn't know what to do with it.
> 

If the world were still there. I'm thinking more of the repulsive force.


> We're looking for The Monolith, and there's no telling what will happen once we
> find it.
> 

Again do we want to? I'm thinking along the lines of an alarm that 
announces that the rats have escaped from their cage.
Which reminds me of a very simple alarm system I saw once. I was working 
in Taronga Zoo a couple of decades ago. I got a back room tour around 
the monkey enclosure. Just as you came to the outer door there was a 
small window with a banana on the inside ledge. If the banana was not 
there then there was a very good chance that a monkey had escaped from 
the inner enclosure and eaten the fruit. Simpler and cheaper than an 
electronic alarm.


-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:

>
> Am I correct when I say that I only see a black screen through the whole
> "animation"?
>

Hmm.

Step #1:
Turn on computer monitor.

Step #2.....

    :-P

I have no idea what might be going on; in Windows Media Player, the downloaded
video doesn't start playing at all (so I use an alternate app.) A black screen
*while* the video plays is a mystery.

Post a reply to this message

"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] gmailcom> wrote:

> I have no idea what might be going on; in Windows Media Player, the downloaded
> video doesn't start playing at all (so I use an alternate app.) A black screen
> *while* the video plays is a mystery.

I think I've had that happen, and it I think it's usually related to it not
being able to recognize the codec.

I think this is why so many people use VLC.

Post a reply to this message

On 13/01/2018 19:31, Bald Eagle wrote:
> I think this is why so many people use VLC.

I think you think correctly.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 13-1-2018 14:09, Bald Eagle wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> 
>> Kontemplator
>> BTW in the animation between 12 & 13 seconds. There is a change in the
>> black and yellow striped material.
> 
> Yes - it's like the frequency of the stripes get increased for some reason.
> 
>>> You guys have made me confused ;-)
> 
> Don't blame us.
> It's either a conscious choice on your part, or you were born that way.
> No trying to imply that it's the result of some sort of POV-user social
> construct.
> 
> And always you two with the negativity.  First there's Stephen with his negative
> light sources, and now you with your con-fusion.

Ah. Somebody forgot to take his medication. I am sure I did take mine; I 
know Stephen did take his, so it must be you :-)

> I've always been pro-fusion myself, and really, with all the new discoveries
> involving graphene, there are some alternatives and with the implications of
> quantum entangled gravity, we may just find a way around that pesky
> Lennard-Jones potential.
> 
> 
See what I mean? Medication. I am not an ABBA fan either. :-)

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message