All in all the scene is somewhat minimalistic. An f_wrinkles isosurface
surrounded by scattering media. No light_source on this one, but emission on the
media object instead. Then my usual stuff with radiosity and focal blur. I added
the clock variable also to emission value, so that brightness changes throughout
the animation and also gives a slight fade here and there. A lot of "what if I
do this" was naturally involved. My experiments with animation shall continue.
:)

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> Two things at the same time?
> Hmm! :)

Hehe yeah, there's a lot going on at the same time: planetoid closing in towards
the camera, camera itself rotating and also angle changing, media scaling,
emission going up and down, and focal blur taking a wild ride on both aperture
and focal_point. :D

Post a reply to this message

On 6/20/2017 7:05 PM, Pekka Aho wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> Two things at the same time?
>> Hmm! :)
>
> Hehe yeah, there's a lot going on at the same time: planetoid closing in towards
> the camera, camera itself rotating and also angle changing, media scaling,
> emission going up and down, and focal blur taking a wild ride on both aperture
> and focal_point. :D
>

I'm impressed that you can keep all that in your mind. :)

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 6/20/2017 7:00 PM, Pekka Aho wrote:
> All in all the scene is somewhat minimalistic. An f_wrinkles isosurface
> surrounded by scattering media. No light_source on this one, but emission on the
> media object instead. Then my usual stuff with radiosity and focal blur. I added
> the clock variable also to emission value, so that brightness changes throughout
> the animation and also gives a slight fade here and there. A lot of "what if I
> do this" was naturally involved. My experiments with animation shall continue.
> :)
>

I generally think tat changing two things at the one time is adventurous. :)

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message