 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:52:14 -0000, "Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbrain com>
wrote:
>The 3D glasses trick works pretty well, although it looks more 3D when I play
>the animation faster :)
...and when you darken the glass the effect will get more too...
I just uploaded a 1 MB 400x400 pixel anaglyphic version (for
red/green or red/blue glasses) to
http://home.pages.at/ducke/tmp/CubicSpaceDivision3D.avi
I tried different players. MS MEdia Player works best and nearly
without jerking...
If you are interested I will upload a hires version tomorrow...
--
Erhard Ducke
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 22:29:18 +0100, Erhard Ducke <duc### [at] gentlemansclubde>
wrote:
> Here it is.
Next time, please think about those with lower frequency in CPU.
Thanks in advance.
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 22:29:18 +0100, Erhard Ducke <duc### [at] gentlemansclubde>
wrote:
>Here it is.
What codec are you using? I have just reinstalled my XP system and the avi does
not play:-{
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Tim Cook
Subject: Re: Escher's 'Cubic Space Division' [1000 KB DivX 5.0.5 400x400 Pixel]
Date: 19 Nov 2003 08:44:32
Message: <3fbb73c0$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen McAvoy wrote:
> What codec are you using? I have just reinstalled my XP system and the avi does
> not play:-{
He says in the header. DivX 5.0.5
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:47:19 -0500, Tim Cook <z99### [at] bellsouthnet> wrote:
>He says in the header. DivX 5.0.5
Duh! i'b bot a told :-{
Thanks
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:38:16 +0100, ABX <abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote:
>Next time, please think about those with lower frequency in CPU.
...by choosing a lower resolution?
--
Erhard Ducke
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:06:37 +0000, Stephen McAvoy
<mcavoys[at]AOLdotCOM> wrote:
>What codec are you using? I have just reinstalled my XP system and the avi does
>not play:-{
...As the subject says ;-)
you can get it at
http://www.divx.com
For decoding purposes get the standard version!
Don't install the ad supported version (GAIN trojan)!
--
Erhard Ducke
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:56:00 +0100, Erhard Ducke <duc### [at] gentlemansclubde>
wrote:
> > Next time, please think about those with lower frequency in CPU.
>
> ...by choosing a lower resolution?
My case is resolution problem. I could see your work but in form of slideshow
rather than nice anim. But the way you posted is wrong in general, because of:
1. non-standard resolution
2. commercial not standarized codec
3. platform limited container format
I would suggest MPG next time. MPG is well (often hardware) supported, widely
used, suggested in this group, ISO codec/format
http://www.mpeg.org/MPEG/starting-points.html#mpeg
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:22:47 +0100, ABX <abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote:
>My case is resolution problem. I could see your work but in form of slideshow
>rather than nice anim. But the way you posted is wrong in general, because of:
Is there a faq available for the POV groups?
> 1. non-standard resolution
CSD definitely has to be a square format...
So I should have chosen 120, 240, 480 and so on?
> 2. commercial not standarized codec
The (co)dec is free and commonly used. More and more standalone
players also support this format.
I decided to use it because IMO DivX gives the best video quality if
compared to other encoding methods (still waiting for theora)
> 3. platform limited container format
There are Mac and Linux versions available...
In general it's OK for me to make mpegs when it is commonly used here
and other formats make problems.
I just didn't know...
--
Erhard Ducke
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:15:30 +0100, Erhard Ducke <duc### [at] gentlemansclubde>
wrote:
> > My case is resolution problem. I could see your work but in form of slideshow
> > rather than nice anim. But the way you posted is wrong in general, because of:
>
> Is there a faq available for the POV groups?
There is whole group about it.
http://news.povray.org/povray.announce.frequently-asked-questions/
news://news.povray.org/povray.announce.frequently-asked-questions/
> > 1. non-standard resolution
> CSD definitely has to be a square format...
> So I should have chosen 120, 240, 480 and so on?
You mean square area with animated image. Wide screens on 4:3 has black margin
above and below animated areas. Good encoder saves black areas without
increasing file size much.
> > 2. commercial not standarized codec
> The (co)dec is free
I browse web and this server from company. I use company machine, company net
and company time for it. I create animations for company. Can I use DivX in
company according to http://www.divx.com/divx/licensing/ ?
> More and more standalone players ...
Players support codecs installed on machines in standard way. And as it stated
in this thread Windowses by default does not support DivX. I recently upgraded
my home machine to XP and P4 and I _really_ wonder if I should install DivX
there. I want to create stable installation for next few years (I had previous
P2 on stable Win95 for six years) without presure to install every new release
of codecs.
> ... also support this format.
Yeah, and they come after ten years for payments like SUN did.
> > 3. platform limited container format
> There are Mac and Linux versions available...
I was reffering to ".AVI".
> In general it's OK for me to make mpegs when it is commonly used here
> and other formats make problems.
Great! Thanks in advance.
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
