 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Which words are you referring to?
Steve Shelby
"Dan P" <dan### [at] yahoo com> wrote in message
news:4057974e$1@news.povray.org...
> "Fernando G. del Cueto" <fcu### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
> news:40575309$1@news.povray.org...
> > This is grooovy baby!
> >
> > A. Powers.
> >
> > news:4057052e@news.povray.org...
> > > Compressing this small enough to post here didn't do it justice, so go
> to
> > > the link below.
> > > http://www.shelbyvision.com/Psychedellic.htm
> > > I think it's worth the wait, but I can't guarantee you will. ;^}>
> > > Steve Shelby
>
>
>
> I think you've just come up with a new official slogan for the POV-Ray
site
> :-)
>
> --
> - Respectfully,
> Dan
> http://<broken link>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Steve Shelby" <ssh### [at] rexnetnet> wrote in message
news:40583e74$1@news.povray.org...
> Which words are you referring to?
> Steve Shelby
Why, "Who needs drugs when we have POV-Ray," of course :-)
--
- Respectfully,
Dan
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Thanks. Did you try the 9.36 mb version? It's 800x600 and shows no loss from
> the original uncompressed .avi. Or were you wanting to just render a still?
Yeah I saw that version, the resolution's good but it's not very smooth, so I
intend to render it with more frames.
I'll let you know how it goes. :)
--
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I've not had any luck with it. I can't make it look quite like the animation
even using pov 3.1, there must be some settings moray does implicitly that I
don't have. Plus there's not actually any animation data in the file, nothing is
using the clock variable.
--
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com
"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
news:40592bc4$1@news.povray.org...
> > Thanks. Did you try the 9.36 mb version? It's 800x600 and shows no loss from
> > the original uncompressed .avi. Or were you wanting to just render a still?
>
> Yeah I saw that version, the resolution's good but it's not very smooth, so I
> intend to render it with more frames.
>
> I'll let you know how it goes. :)
>
> --
> Tek
> www.evilsuperbrain.com
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I opened the same .pov file I sent you and rendered it in pov3.1, and the
the image looks like the attached file. I did not even have Moray open. Does
your render look different from that?
About the clock, Moray's animation plugin produces an .avi directly, without
any clock values being set in POVray. So if you want to animate the scene in
POVray without using Moray, you have to set it up there yourself. My
animation was 8 seconds long and 15 frames per second (119 frames after
skipping the last one for smooth looping). You simply have to make the cone
rotate (around the z axis) 360 degrees in the time specified.
Steve Shelby
"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
news:40593ac2$1@news.povray.org...
> I've not had any luck with it. I can't make it look quite like the
animation
> even using pov 3.1, there must be some settings moray does implicitly that
I
> don't have. Plus there's not actually any animation data in the file,
nothing is
> using the clock variable.
>
> --
> Tek
> www.evilsuperbrain.com
>
> "Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
> news:40592bc4$1@news.povray.org...
> > > Thanks. Did you try the 9.36 mb version? It's 800x600 and shows no
loss from
> > > the original uncompressed .avi. Or were you wanting to just render a
still?
> >
> > Yeah I saw that version, the resolution's good but it's not very smooth,
so I
> > intend to render it with more frames.
> >
> > I'll let you know how it goes. :)
> >
> > --
> > Tek
> > www.evilsuperbrain.com
> >
> >
>
>
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Copy of cone2.jpg' (37 KB)
Preview of image 'Copy of cone2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Dan P" <dan### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:40590023$1@news.povray.org...
> Why, "Who needs drugs when we have POV-Ray," of course :-)
Aaah, OK. I'll leave it to you to get that implemented. ;^}>
Steve
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This is what it looks like on my machine. You can see it doesn't have as much of
a glow as your version. As far as I know I've got no strange settings in POV, I
only installed 3.1 a couple of weeks ago, so it's all set to defaults.
--
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com
"Steve Shelby" <ssh### [at] rexnetnet> wrote in message
news:4059a5f4@news.povray.org...
> I opened the same .pov file I sent you and rendered it in pov3.1, and the
> the image looks like the attached file. I did not even have Moray open. Does
> your render look different from that?
> About the clock, Moray's animation plugin produces an .avi directly, without
> any clock values being set in POVray. So if you want to animate the scene in
> POVray without using Moray, you have to set it up there yourself. My
> animation was 8 seconds long and 15 frames per second (119 frames after
> skipping the last one for smooth looping). You simply have to make the cone
> rotate (around the z axis) 360 degrees in the time specified.
> Steve Shelby
>
> "Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
> news:40593ac2$1@news.povray.org...
> > I've not had any luck with it. I can't make it look quite like the
> animation
> > even using pov 3.1, there must be some settings moray does implicitly that
> I
> > don't have. Plus there's not actually any animation data in the file,
> nothing is
> > using the clock variable.
> >
> > --
> > Tek
> > www.evilsuperbrain.com
> >
> > "Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
> > news:40592bc4$1@news.povray.org...
> > > > Thanks. Did you try the 9.36 mb version? It's 800x600 and shows no
> loss from
> > > > the original uncompressed .avi. Or were you wanting to just render a
> still?
> > >
> > > Yeah I saw that version, the resolution's good but it's not very smooth,
> so I
> > > intend to render it with more frames.
> > >
> > > I'll let you know how it goes. :)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Tek
> > > www.evilsuperbrain.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'cone2.jpg' (15 KB)
Preview of image 'cone2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oh, wow, big difference! I can't imagine what is causing it. I played around
with it in POV3.1 for a while, and came up with nothing. I'm not anything
close to an expert, though. Maybe you should pose the question on
povray.advanced-users.
Steve Shelby
"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
news:405a86e7@news.povray.org...
> This is what it looks like on my machine. You can see it doesn't have as
much of
> a glow as your version. As far as I know I've got no strange settings in
POV, I
> only installed 3.1 a couple of weeks ago, so it's all set to defaults.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Steve Shelby" <ssh### [at] rexnetnet> wrote in message
news:405ae071$1@news.povray.org...
> Oh, wow, big difference! I can't imagine what is causing it. I played
around
> with it in POV3.1 for a while, and came up with nothing. I'm not anything
> close to an expert, though. Maybe you should pose the question on
> povray.advanced-users.
> Steve Shelby
Be careful posting to povray.advanced-users. It can be nasty in that room.
PS: Tek, the hair -- the hair ROCKS, man! Blue hair -- far out.
--
- Respectfully,
Dan
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Steve Shelby" <ssh### [at] rexnetnet> wrote in message
news:405ae071$1@news.povray.org...
> Oh, wow, big difference! I can't imagine what is causing it. I played around
> with it in POV3.1 for a while, and came up with nothing. I'm not anything
> close to an expert, though. Maybe you should pose the question on
> povray.advanced-users.
Ah, don't worry about it. I'm not really that bothered about using pov 3.1 any
more! :)
--
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
