|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
No problem. Perhaps I'll add the Wind
later, as an update. I want to finish and release
a functional version quiet soon, if I get the time
to do so. I'd like to hear some oppinions of
its usability and flexibility (though thats both pretty
limited).
To make it clear: You can choose between
several algorithms to calculate the path a particle
takes. One is "physics", which calculates real
physical contact with the unrotated boundary-box,
another one is "simple" which uses Wind and Gravity
to move particles, but no physical interaction with
the box (it parses quicker than "physics", thus its
"simple" :-) and "macro", which takes a user-defined
macro to calculate a path.
So those animations where particles bounce off of
walls, that's "physics" and has no support for
wind (yet, hoping that it is possible to implement)...
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmx de
>
> Okay, sorry thought there was some sort of wind. Just an idea for the
time
> that you do implement some sort of wind. Nice work once again....
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |