 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Can't think of any technical hints, but "wow".
"Hugo" <hua### [at] post3 teledk> wrote in message
news:3ce7d426$1@news.povray.org...
> > Please do compare this one with the
> > last to see the big difference.
>
> Oh, the new one is much better! More particles? If not, you much be
> introducing a new texture technique. The first second with yellow fire
looks
> a bit odd though, apart from that, it's great.. Also great, that I've got
> your particle system. It's very well written, and I'll reply when I get to
> make some tests on my own!
>
> Regards,
> Hugo
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Great work, but is the spinning necessary? I know it helps show that the
effect can be seen from any angle, but it's a bit dizzying.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hugo wrote:
> Oh, the new one is much better!
Thanks! I think so too. :)
> More particles? If not, you much be
> introducing a new texture technique.
Not any more particles than before, just a different texture. The
texture is actually a simple cylindrical pattern aligned so it faces the
camera. Just as it was before. The trick lies in the fine tuned
turbulence and color_map, and that was I have improved in this
animation.
> The first second with yellow fire looks
> a bit odd though
Ok. In what way?
> apart from that, it's great.. Also great,
> that I've got your particle system. It's
> very well written, and I'll reply when I
> get to make some tests on my own!
Well written? I think it's rather messy. I can't even understand the
code myself! Every time I have to make some changes I first need to take
a few minutes to figure out what I was thinking when I originally wrote
the code...
Anyway, I'm really looking forward to seeing what things you and the
other beta testers can come up with. :)
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Apr 14)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alastair Murray wrote:
> Can't think of any technical hints, but "wow".
Hehe, thanks! :)
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Apr 14)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tony[B] wrote:
> Great work, but is the spinning necessary?
> I know it helps show that the effect can be
> seen from any angle, but it's a bit dizzying.
Ok, I'll tone down the spinning then. :)
I'm also updating the blow-up animation. The one that use a picture of a
real building and - no spinning. :)
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Apr 14)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Really good, but the fact that the dust doesn't settle, but just disapears
spoiled this one for me.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Tim Nikias
Subject: Re: Particle System Explosion 4 (302kbu)
Date: 20 May 2002 05:15:25
Message: <3CE8BE90.3276922@gmx.de>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hm. The texture doesn't fit into the spheres correctly,
I can clearly see some "edges" there...
But the colors and turbulences look way better now!
Rune wrote:
> It's a while ago I posted version 3 of this animation which I thought
> would be the final one.
> Version 3 of this animation was posted on February 15 this year:
> http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.animations/22273/
>
> Now I've made a new one (it's attached here). It's changed very much. I
> rewrote the textures
> completely - the rest is the same. Please do compare this one with the
> last to see the big difference. :)
>
> What do you think? Better? Worse? What could be improved?
>
> Rune
> --
> 3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
> Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Apr 14)
> POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
> POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
>
> Name: newexplosion.mpg
> newexplosion.mpg Type: WMPLAYER Datei (video/mpg)
> Encoding: x-uuencode
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Nikias wrote:
> Hm. The texture doesn't fit into the spheres
> correctly, I can clearly see some "edges" there...
You're right, but it's barely noticeable IMO. The question is if the fix
is worth the extra render time.
> But the colors and turbulences look way better now!
Thanks! :)
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Apr 14)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Artis wrote:
> Really good, but the fact that the dust doesn't
> settle, but just disapears spoiled this one for me.
Interesting point. I'll see what I can do.
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Apr 14)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> You're right, but it's barely noticeable IMO. The question is if the fix
> is worth the extra render time.
>
I'd say so! But it depends what you're after: a small and
fast demonstration or an advanced-working style animation for...
Hm. Star Wars Episode III? ;)
It depends if you're running for realism or just "tracing"
(though we all know that we're all actually trying to do both
at the same time...)
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
