POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.animations : Re: GlowTest animation (~1.2MBbu) Server Time
19 Jul 2024 23:33:00 EDT (-0400)
  Re: GlowTest animation (~1.2MBbu) (Message 11 to 15 of 15)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Zeger Knaepen
Subject: Re: GlowTest animation (~1.2MBbu)
Date: 25 Apr 2002 19:32:42
Message: <3cc8921a@news.povray.org>
> > DivX5 suck*
>   In what way?
>   It's just a codec, not much different from version 4 (except that it has
> much more options).
I doesn't work here.  DivX5-movies give pure blackness, and DivX4-movies look
like they were run over by a car...
And it's not free anymore...

cu!
--
camera{location-z*3}#macro G(b,e)b+(e-b)*(C/50)#end#macro L(b,e,k,l)#local C=0
;#while(C<50)sphere{G(b,e),.1pigment{rgb G(k,l)}finish{ambient 1}}#local C=C+1
;#end#end L(y-x,y,x,x+y)L(y,-x-y,x+y,y)L(-x-y,-y,y,y+z)L(-y,y,y+z,x+y)L(0,x+y,
<.5,1,.5>,x)L(0,x-y,<.5,1,.5>,x)               // ZK http://www.povplace.be.tf


Post a reply to this message

From: Slime
Subject: Re: GlowTest animation (~1.2MBbu)
Date: 25 Apr 2002 20:33:11
Message: <3cc8a047$1@news.povray.org>
>   Why is it so difficult to see that it's a glass sphere?

I can tell it's glass; what I meant was that I see something reflected in
it, or seem to. Probably just me, nevermind.

--
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
[ http://www.slimeland.com/images/ ]


Post a reply to this message

From: Jide
Subject: Re: GlowTest animation (~1.2MBbu)
Date: 26 Apr 2002 04:50:27
Message: <3cc914d3$1@news.povray.org>
Zeger Knaepen wrote:
> > > DivX5 suck*
> >   In what way?
> >   It's just a codec, not much different from version 4 (except that it
has
> > much more options).
> I doesn't work here.  DivX5-movies give pure blackness, and DivX4-movies
look
> like they were run over by a car...
> And it's not free anymore...

I don't have any problems with it and the plain vanilla version costs 0$

--
-Jide


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas Lake
Subject: Re: GlowTest animation (~1.2MBbu)
Date: 26 Apr 2002 06:26:35
Message: <3cc92b5b$1@news.povray.org>
> I doesn't work here.  DivX5-movies give pure blackness, and DivX4-movies
look
> like they were run over by a car...
> And it's not free anymore...

Only the pro version pro version costs money. They didn't cripple the free
version in any way, at least compared to DivX 4. I've never had a problem
with any version of DivX.


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: GlowTest animation (~1.2MBbu)
Date: 29 Apr 2002 12:26:48
Message: <3ccd7447@news.povray.org>
Thomas Lake <tla### [at] remove-thisshawca> wrote:
> Only the pro version pro version costs money. They didn't cripple the free
> version in any way, at least compared to DivX 4. I've never had a problem
> with any version of DivX.

  AFAIK the free version of DivX5 can play correctly any DivX file (even
the ones created with DivX5pro). The difference between the free and the pro
version is in the encoding part: When creating a DivX file, you have less
options.
  So if you are only going to watch DivX animations, the free version is as
good as you can get.

-- 
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.