 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmail com> wrote in message
news:3bbb71a9@news.povray.org...
> Just added a sphere to make things a bit more interesting. The effect is
far
> from being perfect, and you should notice some *errors*.
What errors ?
--
Scott Hill.
Software Engineer.
E-Mail : sco### [at] innocentcom
Pandora's Box : http://www.pandora-software.com
*Everything in this message/post is purely IMHO and no-one-else's*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
JRG wrote:
>
> Just added a sphere to make things a bit more interesting. The effect is far
> from being perfect, and you should notice some *errors*. The problem is that
> I can't find anything wrong in the algorithm, ya know, you look at the code,
> say "this must work", and yet something goes wrong... it's frustrating.
> PS : the tube is not part of the *environment*, so the errors I'm referring
> to are not the blob components passing through it.
>
> Comments and suggestions are still welcome.
It looks great !
It's obviously not water, but find a liquid with a high surface tension,
so that it does not wet the environment and that's it.
It also seems to be rather super-fluid... Liquid Hydrogen ? Quicksilver ?
My only regret is that there is nearly no continuous flow:
there is a opening phase, and a ending one, but no long lasting flow.
And I do not understand where the flow goes.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
So that is how rubber balls are made. They just pour out the liquid
rubber mass on the floor, and it breaks up in perfect little spheres
that roll away. :-)
/Ib
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That's pretty cool. I would make it a bit less bouncy and use more
particles, though. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'm using 10000 particles here...
But it certainly still needs a lot of work, so I will try to lower the
elasticity (here 0.5).
The major problem here is to discover what is wrong with the algorithm I'm
using...
Thanks for the suggestions.
--
Jonathan
"Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholicorg> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:3bbded36@news.povray.org...
> That's pretty cool. I would make it a bit less bouncy and use more
> particles, though. :)
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3bbdf04d@news.povray.org...
> The major problem here is to discover what is wrong with the algorithm I'm
> using...
I can't see anything that suggest there is anything wrong with your
algorithm... What's it doing that you don't want it to, or not doing that
you do ?
--
Scott Hill.
Software Engineer.
E-Mail : sco### [at] innocentcom
Pandora's Box : http://www.pandora-software.com
*Everything in this message/post is purely IMHO and no-one-else's*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Look at the bottom-left particles at the end of the animation: can you see
those particles passing through the *wall* and following the hidden part of
the sphere?
(Does what I've said make sense?)
--
Jonathan.
"Scott Hill" <sco### [at] innocentcom> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:3bbe2d41@news.povray.org...
> "JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
> news:3bbdf04d@news.povray.org...
> > The major problem here is to discover what is wrong with the algorithm
I'm
> > using...
>
> I can't see anything that suggest there is anything wrong with your
> algorithm... What's it doing that you don't want it to, or not doing that
> you do ?
>
> --
> Scott Hill.
> Software Engineer.
> E-Mail : sco### [at] innocentcom
> Pandora's Box : http://www.pandora-software.com
>
> *Everything in this message/post is purely IMHO and no-one-else's*
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
