 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You want me to post an MPEG? It's probably 3 times as big.
ZK
http://www.povplace.be.tf
Greg M. Johnson <gre### [at] my-dejanews com> schreef in berichtnieuws
39C233EC.96C80ECA@my-dejanews.com...
> probably because it's not an MPG.
>
> Zeger Knaepen wrote:
>
> > Why not?
> >
> > ZK
> > http://www.povplace.be.tf
> >
> > Greg M. Johnson <gre### [at] my-dejanewscom> schreef in berichtnieuws
> > 39C21324.DFDD53CB@my-dejanews.com...
> > > I couldn't see it.
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Zeger Knaepen" <zeg### [at] yahoocom> wrote :
>
> You want me to post an MPEG? It's probably 3 times as big.
I have always found it to be exactly the opposite. Or at least
potentially the opposite, because I can take a 3 meg AVI and scrunch it into
a 1 meg MPEG, even smaller if I am willing to bear the loss.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I have always found it to be exactly the opposite. Or at least
> potentially the opposite, because I can take a 3 meg AVI and scrunch it
into
> a 1 meg MPEG, even smaller if I am willing to bear the loss.
A DivX ;-) AVI???
I find that hard to believe.
ZK
http://www.povplace.be.tf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Zeger Knaepen" <zeg### [at] yahoocom> wrote :
>
> A DivX ;-) AVI???
> I find that hard to believe.
Ah... well... I haven't made a DivX;-) AVI so I shouldn't talk. I was
talking about regular AVIs like Fast Movie Processor makes. I don't even
know what type that is, but I have converted all my AVIs over to MPEG and
got 2:1 or 3:1 reduction.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Ah... well... I haven't made a DivX;-) AVI so I shouldn't talk. I was
> talking about regular AVIs like Fast Movie Processor makes. I don't even
> know what type that is, but I have converted all my AVIs over to MPEG and
> got 2:1 or 3:1 reduction.
if i hadnt tried divX then i would have agreed with you, its only because i
wanted to watch some arnold movies that i installed the codec, then thaught
i would give it a try, boy was i impressed!
Rick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news:39c12a16@news.povray.org...
>
> "Zeger Knaepen" <zeg### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
> news:39c11d5e@news.povray.org...
> > I think this one has a StarWars-look...
> > Well, a bit anyway.
> >
> > ZK
> > http://www.povplace.be.tf
> >
> >
> >
>
> My Microsoft Mediaplayer 7 tolled me
How much was the toll? It played on mine for free ... :)
--
Paul Vanukof
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > My Microsoft Mediaplayer 7 tolled me
>
> How much was the toll? It played on mine for free ... :)
Nothing's free...
ZK
http://www.povplace.be.tf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
divx is pretty good, but if bink and smacker didn't have that stupid ad
at the end of every video, i'd prefer that instead. they say it's
better than dvd and they few vids i've seen look incredible.
"Rick [Kitty5]" wrote:
>
> > Ah... well... I haven't made a DivX;-) AVI so I shouldn't talk. I was
> > talking about regular AVIs like Fast Movie Processor makes. I don't even
> > know what type that is, but I have converted all my AVIs over to MPEG and
> > got 2:1 or 3:1 reduction.
>
> if i hadnt tried divX then i would have agreed with you, its only because i
> wanted to watch some arnold movies that i installed the codec, then thaught
> i would give it a try, boy was i impressed!
>
> Rick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rick [Kitty5]" <ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote :
>
> if i hadnt tried divX then i would have agreed with you, its only because
i
> wanted to watch some arnold movies that i installed the codec, then
thaught
> i would give it a try, boy was i impressed!
I've been trying it out and a file that is 2500 in my regular avi format
is about 550 in divx, but only about 620 in a similar quality mpeg. Still
have some testing to do, and my eye for quality is not what some people's
might be, but so far I don't see that a few percent reduction in file size
is worth making other people find and download yet another file just to see
my animation. MPEG is a pretty fair standard right now, although I am
curious about mayo...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> is worth making other people find and download yet another file just to
see
> my animation. MPEG is a pretty fair standard right now, although I am
> curious about mayo...
i know, but i have never never had any success in making a mpeg from an avi
(or anything else), so divx provided me with a simple way of getting a
similar result easily
there needs to be an online povray groups FAQ i think, where such
information could be published etc
Rick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
