POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.animations : Re: It would have been cool... Server Time
21 Jul 2024 01:27:44 EDT (-0400)
  Re: It would have been cool... (Message 11 to 15 of 15)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Josh English
Subject: Re: It would have been cool...
Date: 26 Jan 2000 15:10:34
Message: <388F549A.B329354E@spiritone.com>
It is cool... and it makes perfect sense. This thing falls and bounces,
stabilizes, then realizing that it's hit the floor, throws a temper tantrum.
My best friends 8 month old daughter does the same thing...

John VanSickle wrote:

> I had the idea of simulating the behavior of a bunch of weights and
> springs all connected together.  I tried one approach to simulating
> this, resulting in the animation attached to this message.  As you
> can see, it starts out OK, but begins to oscillate in an unnatural
> fashion.  I have an idea for a method of cheating away the problem,
> but I'm also working on my next IRTC entry as well.  When results are
> forthcoming I'll post something more useful.
>
> Regards,
> John
> --
> ICQ: 46085459
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                Name: not!.mpg
>    not!.mpg    Type: MPLAYER2 File (video/mpeg)
>            Encoding: base64

--
Josh English
eng### [at] spiritonecom
"May your hopes, dreams, and plans not be destroyed by a few zeros."


Post a reply to this message

From: Axel Hecht
Subject: Re: It would have been cool...
Date: 27 Jan 2000 11:09:47
Message: <38906DCF.674218F7@numerik.uni-kiel.de>
Josh English wrote:
> 
> It is cool... and it makes perfect sense. This thing falls and bounces,
> stabilizes, then realizing that it's hit the floor, throws a temper tantrum.
> My best friends 8 month old daughter does the same thing...

Sounds like you check that out twice a day, just in case things
change...

;-)

Axel

> 
<..>


Post a reply to this message

From: Matt Giwer
Subject: Re: It would have been cool...
Date: 29 Jan 2000 22:42:04
Message: <3893B357.F33C2CE3@ij.net>
John VanSickle wrote:

> I had the idea of simulating the behavior of a bunch of weights and
> springs all connected together.  I tried one approach to simulating
> this, resulting in the animation attached to this message.  As you
> can see, it starts out OK, but begins to oscillate in an unnatural
> fashion.  I have an idea for a method of cheating away the problem,
> but I'm also working on my next IRTC entry as well.  When results are
> forthcoming I'll post something more useful.

    Finite element solutions?

--
"If I am the one, who is the two?" - Neo


Post a reply to this message

From: Matt Giwer
Subject: Re: It would have been cool...
Date: 30 Jan 2000 14:29:51
Message: <3894917D.77046728@ij.net>
John VanSickle wrote:

> Matt Giwer wrote:
> >
> >     Finite element solutions?
>
> I'm not familiar with the phrase.  Could you elucidate?

    Break down an object into small elements and describe
the nodes (vertices) of each element with the equations
that would locally control their interaction. Smaller the
better but the greater the processing time. Finite element
as it is an approximation to the integral solution where
the variable gets smaller but does not reach infinity,
therefore finite. Used primarily where the complete
solution is too hard or does not exist. Such as locally, in
small elements, relationships can be modeled as linear
where the behavior over the complete surface in non-linear.

    And of course in this animation where a four-body
problem solution is the animation.


Post a reply to this message

From: Greg M  Johnson
Subject: Re: It would have been cool...
Date: 4 Feb 2000 11:43:50
Message: <389B00ED.6DC7C14A@my-dejanews.com>
Wah.
I have spent some time turning my flocking algorithm into a beach ball
algorithm, trying to turn my actors into points on the surface of a ball.  I
cannot keep the "ball" from completely collapsing upon hitting the ground...

John VanSickle wrote:

> I had the idea of simulating the behavior of a bunch of weights and
> springs all connected together.  I tried one approach to simulating
> this, resulting in the animation attached to this message.  As you
> can see, it starts out OK, but begins to oscillate in an unnatural
> fashion.  I have an idea for a method of cheating away the problem,
> but I'm also working on my next IRTC entry as well.  When results are
> forthcoming I'll post something more useful.
>
> Regards,
> John
> --
> ICQ: 46085459
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                   Name: not!.mpg
>    not!.mpg       Type: MPEG Video (video/mpeg)
>               Encoding: base64


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.