 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
http://www.turboflux.ab.ca/gallery/blast2.mpeg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
i know it's stillvery spherical i'm working on that
Noah A wrote:
> http://www.turboflux.ab.ca/gallery/blast2.mpeg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
feel free to comment
Noah A wrote:
> http://www.turboflux.ab.ca/gallery/blast2.mpeg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It's looking better to me. The particles move out more realistically,
now maybe if a few of them blew up of their own accord in smaller
explosions, bits for gas and fire....
Noah A wrote:
> http://www.turboflux.ab.ca/gallery/blast2.mpeg
--
Josh English
eng### [at] spiritone com
"May your hopes, dreams, and plans not be destroyed by a few zeros."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
If this is still a Blender output then why is it being continually shown here at
the povray news groups? I don't know about the program, does it output POV-Ray
compatible files (in any way shape or form)?
The animation is good, nice effect. I just don't see any point in posting
images, animations or even linking to them here at news.povray. Not that I'm
scolding or anything, just common sense I think since there is other newsgroups
people read like c.g.r.r. for one.
Bob
"Noah A" <vip### [at] powersurfrcom> wrote in message
news:38892022.FB2488D7@powersurfr.com...
| http://www.turboflux.ab.ca/gallery/blast2.mpeg
|
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gee, I re-read this and I sound awfully POV-Ray-centric don't I? :-)
No ill will intended.
Bob
"Bob Hughes" <omn### [at] hotmailcom?subject=PoV-News:> wrote in message
news:388c929c@news.povray.org...
| If this is still a Blender output then why is it being continually shown here
at
| the povray news groups? I don't know about the program, does it output
POV-Ray
| compatible files (in any way shape or form)?
| The animation is good, nice effect. I just don't see any point in posting
| images, animations or even linking to them here at news.povray. Not that I'm
| scolding or anything, just common sense I think since there is other
newsgroups
| people read like c.g.r.r. for one.
|
| Bob
|
| "Noah A" <vip### [at] powersurfrcom> wrote in message
| news:38892022.FB2488D7@powersurfr.com...
| | http://www.turboflux.ab.ca/gallery/blast2.mpeg
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
there is currently a povray export python script that is being improved slowly.
I CAHALLENGE YOU ALL TO MAKE SOMTHING THE SAME OR BETTER! with render ytime of less
than 72h
Bob Hughes wrote:
> If this is still a Blender output then why is it being continually shown here at
> the povray news groups? I don't know about the program, does it output POV-Ray
> compatible files (in any way shape or form)?
> The animation is good, nice effect. I just don't see any point in posting
> images, animations or even linking to them here at news.povray. Not that I'm
> scolding or anything, just common sense I think since there is other newsgroups
> people read like c.g.r.r. for one.
>
> Bob
>
> "Noah A" <vip### [at] powersurfrcom> wrote in message
> news:38892022.FB2488D7@powersurfr.com...
> | http://www.turboflux.ab.ca/gallery/blast2.mpeg
> |
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 19:47:40 -0700, Noah A <vip### [at] powersurfrcom>
wrote:
>there is currently a povray export python script that is being improved slowly.
>
>I CAHALLENGE YOU ALL TO MAKE SOMTHING THE SAME OR BETTER! with render ytime of less
>than 72h
I'm sure Lance can do it :)
And I challenge you to make a scene with volumetrics, radiosity,
blurred reflection, refraction, dispersion and caustics in less than a
year (before someone implements raytracing in Blender) :)))
If a piece of software is on the market (generally speaking, even if
the s/w is free) then there must be at least one thing it's better at
than others in the same price range. Blender's obviously good at
volumetrics and particles, ok, and I've seen very motion-wise
realistic anims made with it. Still, I think one should confine such
to the off-topic. I, for example, have set up my newsreader so that it
saves all attachments from p.b.i. in a separate directory so that I
can browse them from time to time. I'd hate to see such a cool
explosion as yours, search for the post and find out it has not been
made with POV.
Peter Popov
pet### [at] usanet
ICQ: 15002700
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Noah A" <vip### [at] powersurfrcom> wrote in message
news:388D0ECC.7B4951C0@powersurfr.com...
| there is currently a povray export python script that is being improved
slowly.
Hey, that's good to know. Thanks for telling me.
| I CAHALLENGE YOU ALL TO MAKE SOMTHING THE SAME OR BETTER! with render ytime of
less
| than 72h
Umm, how about 72 days instead? LOL Oh, render time, not creation time... well
then there's still hope.
I apologize about the somewhat disgruntled reply before, just thought there
wasn't any connection to POV-Ray at all. I should have checked into it further.
I've been raytracing too long, but still not long enough with POV-Ray ;-)
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
even though i have lots of programs i still love povray most of all it makes thre
best quality images and the price is right too!
Bob Hughes wrote:
> "Noah A" <vip### [at] powersurfrcom> wrote in message
> news:388D0ECC.7B4951C0@powersurfr.com...
> | there is currently a povray export python script that is being improved
> slowly.
>
> Hey, that's good to know. Thanks for telling me.
>
> | I CAHALLENGE YOU ALL TO MAKE SOMTHING THE SAME OR BETTER! with render ytime of
> less
> | than 72h
>
> Umm, how about 72 days instead? LOL Oh, render time, not creation time... well
> then there's still hope.
> I apologize about the somewhat disgruntled reply before, just thought there
> wasn't any connection to POV-Ray at all. I should have checked into it further.
> I've been raytracing too long, but still not long enough with POV-Ray ;-)
>
> Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
