"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> "Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> I simplified your code a bit, so I could understand it more easily. I've posted
> it below, with a few notes of my own.
Thanks :) It's been a while since I started working on that - and realized my
HS-level physics was , er, rusty.
It was a WIP, so as you saw, there were bits an pieces of things here and there
that weren't implemented. "Uncommented notes" ;)
A simple bouncing macro would be a fun toy for people to play with, I think.
Post a reply to this message