POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.beta-test : Known Bugs 14 Jan 2002 Server Time
30 Jul 2024 10:20:52 EDT (-0400)
  Known Bugs 14 Jan 2002 (Message 21 to 30 of 43)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From:
Subject: Re: Known Bugs 14 Jan 2002
Date: 15 Jan 2002 10:54:03
Message: <s2k84ucqhiiubmo9geu33emvqeabibhvqr@4ax.com>
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:35:58 +0900, "R. Suzuki" <r-s### [at] aistgojp> wrote:
> However, to determine the parameters, the user need to know the
> max_gradient value.  But the current beta does not report the
> max_gradient value if 'evaluate' is used... That is not consistent with
> POV-Help.

I can confirm with POV 3.5 b 10.icl on PII 233 128 MB with NT 4 Sp 6

ABX
--
disc{z,-z 5#macro O()asc(substr("-+((1*(,1,/.-,*/(,&.323/'1"e,1))*.1-4#declare
e=e-1;#end#local e=26;pigment{#local g=function(_){ceil(_)-_}function#local//X
k=function{pattern{object{sphere_sweep{linear_spline 13#while(e>0)<O(),O()//AB
>.01#end}}}}{k(g(atan2(x,y)),g(ln((y+x)^2+1e-5)),0)}}finish{ambient 1}}//POV35


Post a reply to this message

From: Thorsten Froehlich
Subject: Re: Known Bugs 14 Jan 2002
Date: 15 Jan 2002 11:18:26
Message: <3c445652@news.povray.org>
In article <3c444c4b@news.povray.org> , "R. Suzuki" <r-s### [at] aistgojp> 
wrote:

> However, to determine the parameters, the user need to know the
> max_gradient value.  But the current beta does not report the
> max_gradient value if 'evaluate' is used... That is not consistent with
> POV-Help.

It is by design for _this_ beta and part of the changes to the output that
have been in progress for several weeks now until a final solution can be
found.  The previous beta versions' output was incorrect, the current change
only disables the incorrect output without providing the correct output yet.

    Thorsten

____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde

Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org


Post a reply to this message

From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: Known Bugs 14 Jan 2002
Date: 15 Jan 2002 13:57:36
Message: <3C447B93.CC3C8553@gmx.de>
Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
> 
> It is by design for _this_ beta and part of the changes to the output that
> have been in progress for several weeks now until a final solution can be
> found.  The previous beta versions' output was incorrect, the current change
> only disables the incorrect output without providing the correct output yet.
> 

I suppose this means that part is still subject to change and i should
wait with writing the announced doc part.

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/


Post a reply to this message

From: Thorsten Froehlich
Subject: Re: Known Bugs 14 Jan 2002
Date: 15 Jan 2002 14:26:11
Message: <3c448253@news.povray.org>
In article <3C447B93.CC3C8553@gmx.de> , Christoph Hormann 
<chr### [at] gmxde>  wrote:

>> It is by design for _this_ beta and part of the changes to the output that
>> have been in progress for several weeks now until a final solution can be
>> found.  The previous beta versions' output was incorrect, the current change
>> only disables the incorrect output without providing the correct output yet.
>>
>
> I suppose this means that part is still subject to change and i should
> wait with writing the announced doc part.

Only the "evaluate" part, that ios the "dynamic method" part, is subject to
change.  Using the method with the constant max_gradient I expect no need
for changes.

    Thorsten

____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde

Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org


Post a reply to this message

From: Batronyx
Subject: Re: Known Bugs 14 Jan 2002
Date: 15 Jan 2002 21:21:59
Message: <3c44e3c7$1@news.povray.org>
"R. Suzuki" <r-s### [at] aistgojp> wrote in message

> That is useful in some cases.  For example, try the following JRG's
> code with "evaluate 1.2, 1.1, 0.98" instead of "evaluate 1, 10, 0.99".
> http://news.povray.org/3bdf2d82%40news.povray.org
> The rendering speed would be faster than the fixed max_gradient.
>
> Those parameters of the recent beta work as designed.
> The description of those parameters can be seen at
> http://news.povray.org/3be10cf9@news.povray.org
>

Both of these messages are in the same thread and I had read it at least twice.
But reading it a third time in the context of your explanation of the useful
cases, seems to have helped. I wasn't clear until now exactly what the 'user
error' was. Thanks for helping to clarify.

--
light_source{0,1}#macro c(J,a)sphere{0,1pigment{rgb z}scale a translate J+O}
#end#macro B(R,V,O)c(0,4)intersection{c(V,R)difference{c(-z*4x+10)c(-z*4.1x+
10)c(0<7.5,45,5>)}}#end B(12,0z*25)B(8y*4<0,12,50>)          // Batronyx ^"^


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Williams
Subject: Re: Known Bugs 14 Jan 2002
Date: 16 Jan 2002 13:55:20
Message: <4gzZ3BACEbR8Ew0L@econym.demon.co.uk>
Wasn't it Coridon Henshaw who wrote:

>Incidentally, do you have a current list of unconfirmed bugs?  I'd like to 
>go through it and look for confirmable problems.

This isn't completely up to date. I've been a bit busy recently.


max_trace_level affects radiosity recursion_limit
(Setting max_trace_level 1 disables radiosity and max_trace_level 2 sets
recursion_limit to 1)
http://news.povray.org/3BE40295.6C3D54DE@engineer.com

Bugs with string/macro handling
http://news.povray.org/3be76148$1@news.povray.org

Philosophical objection to fog distance=0
(Fog colour is then ignored)
http://news.povray.org/3BE7E897.FEC8EF6@aol.com

Animated textures
(memory usage goes quite high)
http://news.povray.org/3bea26bf@news.povray.org

Isosurface *disappears* at high resolution (fwd)
http://news.povray.org/3bb0b351@news.povray.org

Media visible container line in front of object
(a visible whitish line appears at the edge of a transparent container
box for media)
http://news.povray.org/3bf45a3d@news.povray.org

Priority troubles
(higher priorities cause slower render)
http://news.povray.org/

[win gui] line with error highlighted but render finished succesfully
http://news.povray.org/va2tvt4tuitd67ik5t9ps334sbg6205bt3@4ax.com

var_refl.pov (\scenes\textues\finishes) Beta 8
(should #include "functions.inc")
http://news.povray.org/3C0A9650.6B98925@compuserve.com

transform syntax
(transform {test_trans} sometimes requires {} and sometimes doesn't)
http://news.povray.org/3C09EE1B.A38DC91A@gmx.de

Win Beta 8: Message window/parse hang error?
(hangs after "Degenerate Blob" warning)
http://news.povray.org/3c0bdc77@news.povray.org

another bug I haven't seen mentioned
(Yellow band around sky_sphere equator)
http://news.povray.org/3c10ef62$1@news.povray.org

media & fog bug?
http://news.povray.org/3c1379e0$1@news.povray.org

bug in sphere_sweep for removing parts of an object
(parameterised sphere_sweeps are very slow. May or may not be related to
job000176)
http://news.povray.org/3C1A5D47.EA38F6E5@amc.uva.nl

Re: Mosaic... some clarifications
(#local A2=P(1,2,3).hf; fails)
http://news.povray.org/9n9j1uo0mdlrs4i5toupujr0pqrj4vvb8d@4ax.com

Re: hollow in light groups
http://news.povray.org/3c21172d$1@news.povray.org

Is there a problem with area light
http://news.povray.org/3c22f013@news.povray.org

Bug with transform syntax
http://news.povray.org/chrishuff-5FC1B7.19310427122001@netplex.aussie.or
g

Minor Windows annoyance
http://news.povray.org/3c2bec89@news.povray.org

[linux] Rendering without display on the console.
http://news.povray.org/3c3f0a80@news.povray.org

Beta 10 bugs
(Demo scenes in scenes\camera\ will not parse)
http://news.povray.org/Xns9197A5B08390CCQ@204.213.191.226

-- 
Mike Williams
Gentleman of Leisure


Post a reply to this message

From: Mark Gordon
Subject: Re: Known Bugs 14 Jan 2002
Date: 16 Jan 2002 14:12:01
Message: <pan.2002.01.16.14.12.01.487968.19817@povray.org>
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:57:38 -0500, Mike Williams wrote:

> Wasn't it Coridon Henshaw who wrote:
> 
>>Incidentally, do you have a current list of unconfirmed bugs?  I'd like
>>to go through it and look for confirmable problems.
> 
> This isn't completely up to date. I've been a bit busy recently.

> [linux] Rendering without display on the console.
> http://news.povray.org/3c3f0a80@news.povray.org

Fixed in Beta 10.

-Mark Gordon


Post a reply to this message

From: Coridon Henshaw
Subject: Re: Known Bugs 14 Jan 2002
Date: 16 Jan 2002 17:02:10
Message: <Xns9198AD4D5BBF4CQ@204.213.191.226>
Mike Williams <mik### [at] nospamplease> wrote in
news:4gz### [at] econymdemoncouk: 

> max_trace_level affects radiosity recursion_limit
> (Setting max_trace_level 1 disables radiosity and max_trace_level 2
> sets recursion_limit to 1)
> http://news.povray.org/3BE40295.6C3D54DE@engineer.com

I can confirm portions of this report.  While reducing max_trace_level to 1 
does not disable radiosity under beta 10, max_trace_level does appear to 
impose an upper bound on recursion_limit.  recursion_limit settings in 
excess of the max_trace_level appear to be ignored.
 
> Bugs with string/macro handling
> http://news.povray.org/3be76148$1@news.povray.org

Partial confirmation.  I can get error cases #1 (Too many nested symbol 
tables) and #2 ("BCFGHJKLMQSUVWXY") but none of the others.

At first glance that the original poster is trying to do with the scene 
description language is somewhat akin to driving nails with a shoe.  As 
such I am unsure if this problem should be fixed or if the workaround 
should be 'reimplement your code in perl, Python, rexx, or C.'
 
> Philosophical objection to fog distance=0
> (Fog colour is then ignored)
> http://news.povray.org/3BE7E897.FEC8EF6@aol.com

Confirmed that the code provided works as the original poster stated.

> Animated textures
> (memory usage goes quite high)
> http://news.povray.org/3bea26bf@news.povray.org

Not tested.  I suspect this bug might be another incarnation of one of the 
various memory leaks reported elsewhere.
 
> Isosurface *disappears* at high resolution (fwd)
> http://news.povray.org/3bb0b351@news.povray.org

Cannot duplicate.
 
> Media visible container line in front of object
> (a visible whitish line appears at the edge of a transparent container
> box for media)
> http://news.povray.org/3bf45a3d@news.povray.org

Confirmed.  This problem can be masked--but not eliminated--with 
antialiasing.
 
> Priority troubles
> (higher priorities cause slower render)
> http://news.povray.org/

Uhhh, message-id?  ;-)

> [win gui] line with error highlighted but render finished succesfully
> http://news.povray.org/va2tvt4tuitd67ik5t9ps334sbg6205bt3@4ax.com

Not tested specifically, but I've run into this problem before with 
ordinary parsing errors (e.g. undeclared identifiers) not related to 
#fopen.
 
> var_refl.pov (\scenes\textues\finishes) Beta 8
> (should #include "functions.inc")
> http://news.povray.org/3C0A9650.6B98925@compuserve.com

Cannot duplicate.
 
> transform syntax
> (transform {test_trans} sometimes requires {} and sometimes doesn't)
> http://news.povray.org/3C09EE1B.A38DC91A@gmx.de

Confirmed.

> Win Beta 8: Message window/parse hang error?
> (hangs after "Degenerate Blob" warning)
> http://news.povray.org/3c0bdc77@news.povray.org

Insufficient data to make a determination.

A generic scene containing a single degenerate blob did not cause pov to 
lock up.

> another bug I haven't seen mentioned
> (Yellow band around sky_sphere equator)
> http://news.povray.org/3c10ef62$1@news.povray.org

Cannot duplicate with the following scene:

sky_sphere {pigment {gradient y triangle_wave color_map {[0 rgb 0] [1 rgb 
1]}}}

If the original poster can provide a sample scene I will try again.
 
> media & fog bug?
> http://news.povray.org/3c1379e0$1@news.povray.org

Confirmed.
 
> bug in sphere_sweep for removing parts of an object
> (parameterised sphere_sweeps are very slow. May or may not be related
> to job000176)
> http://news.povray.org/3C1A5D47.EA38F6E5@amc.uva.nl

Confirmed.
 
> Re: Mosaic... some clarifications
> (#local A2=P(1,2,3).hf; fails)
> http://news.povray.org/9n9j1uo0mdlrs4i5toupujr0pqrj4vvb8d@4ax.com

Confirmed.
 
> Re: hollow in light groups
> http://news.povray.org/3c21172d$1@news.povray.org

Confirmed.
 
> Is there a problem with area light
> http://news.povray.org/3c22f013@news.povray.org

Cannot duplicate.  area_light settings which produce smooth shadows under 
3.1 also produce smooth shadows under 3.5.
 
> Bug with transform syntax
> http://news.povray.org/chrishuff-5FC1B7.19310427122001@netplex.aussie.or
> g

Confirmed.
 
> Minor Windows annoyance
> http://news.povray.org/3c2bec89@news.povray.org

Chris Cason said (in <3c2c6b4a@news.povray.org>) that he's looking into 
this one.


Post a reply to this message

From: Coridon Henshaw
Subject: Re: Known Bugs 14 Jan 2002
Date: 16 Jan 2002 18:38:56
Message: <Xns9198BDB4453DEcsbhccse@204.213.191.226>
che### [at] sympaticoca (Coridon Henshaw) wrote in
news:Xns### [at] 204213191226: 

>> Isosurface *disappears* at high resolution (fwd)
>> http://news.povray.org/3bb0b351@news.povray.org
> 
> Cannot duplicate.

Correction.  Confirmed.


Post a reply to this message

From: Thorsten Froehlich
Subject: Re: Known Bugs 14 Jan 2002
Date: 16 Jan 2002 19:02:17
Message: <3c461489@news.povray.org>
In article <Xns### [at] 204213191226> , 
che### [at] sympaticoca (Coridon Henshaw) wrote:

> che### [at] sympaticoca (Coridon Henshaw) wrote in
> news:Xns### [at] 204213191226:
>
>>> Isosurface *disappears* at high resolution (fwd)
>>> http://news.povray.org/3bb0b351@news.povray.org
>>
>> Cannot duplicate.
>
> Correction.  Confirmed.

This "bug" never was one as explained in the same thread.

I am surprised it is still in the unconfirmed list at all...

    Thorsten

____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich
e-mail: mac### [at] povrayorg

I am a member of the POV-Ray Team.
Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.