 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le Forgeron wrote:
> Le Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:25:26 +0200, Thorsten Froehlich a modifié des
> petits morceaux de l'univers pour nous faire lire :
>
>> You need to use a pre-1.35 boost.
>>
>
> Can you be a bit more specific ? I'm on gentoo (boost is 1.35-r1 so far,
> but might evolve anytime soon), so i'm interested a bit by this subject.
>
>> Please read the *boost* documentation, as this is not a POV-Ray issue!
>
> Which part, please, as boost is really a huge collection of parts ?
> thread ? mutex ? other ?
How about the description of changes since boost 1.34? ;-) If you look, you
will find the details in there. It basically has to do with changes in order
to match the C++ 0x compromises on threading.
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John Coppens wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:39:21 -0300
> John Coppens <joh### [at] johncoppens com> wrote:
>
>> How does the problem manifest itself?
>
> I mean - maybe this is a windows-only problem?
No, please check the boost documentation.
As for how the problem may manifest itself? - With stack overflows _if_ it
compiles, and with concurrency issues, which won't cause problems all the
time of course.
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John Coppens wrote:
> How does the problem manifest itself? I have 3.7beta compiled with
> Boost 1.36, and the executable _does_ render. I haven't rendered many
I'm not saying there's definitely a problem: I simply responded to a
report that the source doesn't play nice with boost 1.36 by pointing
out that the README explicitly states that later versions of boost
than 1.34_1 aren't supported by us.
Until such time as I can thoroughly test the code with 1.35/1.36 (as I
know some threading changes were made), it won't be supported by us.
That's not to say it won't work (VS2008 isn't supported by us either,
but it reportedly is able to build the code ...).
-- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
