 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
using windows Movie Maker, because I can't afford to buy anything at this time.
0.5 seconds on each still frame, 15 frames in 0.9 seconds for the tilt-up of the
walls
the tilt-up is much smoother than I thought it would be.
https://youtu.be/J1R3EnIDCgc
you can see version 1 in the thread /animations/grouping objects for transforms
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Klewlis" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> using windows Movie Maker, because I can't afford to buy anything at this time.
>
> 0.5 seconds on each still frame, 15 frames in 0.9 seconds for the tilt-up of the
> walls
>
> the tilt-up is much smoother than I thought it would be.
>
> https://youtu.be/J1R3EnIDCgc
>
> you can see version 1 in the thread /animations/grouping objects for transforms
Looks good! Sure helps add fluidity having movement... hey, a thought... which
you seemed to be hinting at already. Camera view moving around from wall to wall
would give it less slideshow feel too.
Animation doesn't always need a high frame rate anyway, cartoons often use low
frame counts; so 12 per second can be okay. Yours was 16.667 per second for
those fastest parts.
Hmm, on that note... if you do move the camera all the way around it'll require
upping the frame count per second since that's a lot of movement.
Maybe just going from first position to last position (walls to roof) from start
to end could be okay...?
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2/12/2017 7:39 PM, omniverse wrote:
> Looks good! Sure helps add fluidity having movement... hey, a thought...
And a slight movement in the sky would help with a sense of "time going by".
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aol com> wrote:
> On 2/12/2017 7:39 PM, omniverse wrote:
> > Looks good! Sure helps add fluidity having movement... hey, a thought...
>
> And a slight movement in the sky would help with a sense of "time going by".
Yeah, good idea, makes me think time lapse photography to get a real sense of
actual build time. Although sunrise to sunset would indicate a slow build for
what's there right now, so maybe either sunrise to noon or noon to sunset until
more complete.
Or am I overthinking this? ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2/12/2017 9:49 PM, omniverse wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> On 2/12/2017 7:39 PM, omniverse wrote:
>>> Looks good! Sure helps add fluidity having movement... hey, a thought...
>>
>> And a slight movement in the sky would help with a sense of "time going by".
>
> Yeah, good idea, makes me think time lapse photography to get a real sense of
> actual build time. Although sunrise to sunset would indicate a slow build for
> what's there right now, so maybe either sunrise to noon or noon to sunset until
> more complete.
> Or am I overthinking this? ;)
>
>
>
No, dawn to dusk would be my preference.
A good days work. :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13-2-2017 0:47, Stephen wrote:
> On 2/12/2017 9:49 PM, omniverse wrote:
>> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>>> On 2/12/2017 7:39 PM, omniverse wrote:
>>>> Looks good! Sure helps add fluidity having movement... hey, a
>>>> thought...
>>>
>>> And a slight movement in the sky would help with a sense of "time
>>> going by".
>>
>> Yeah, good idea, makes me think time lapse photography to get a real
>> sense of
>> actual build time. Although sunrise to sunset would indicate a slow
>> build for
>> what's there right now, so maybe either sunrise to noon or noon to
>> sunset until
>> more complete.
>> Or am I overthinking this? ;)
>>
>>
>>
> No, dawn to dusk would be my preference.
> A good days work. :-)
>
With a pause at noon surely? The man needs to eat! ;-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2/13/2017 7:55 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 13-2-2017 0:47, Stephen wrote:
>> On 2/12/2017 9:49 PM, omniverse wrote:
>>> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>>>> On 2/12/2017 7:39 PM, omniverse wrote:
>>>>> Looks good! Sure helps add fluidity having movement... hey, a
>>>>> thought...
>>>>
>>>> And a slight movement in the sky would help with a sense of "time
>>>> going by".
>>>
>>> Yeah, good idea, makes me think time lapse photography to get a real
>>> sense of
>>> actual build time. Although sunrise to sunset would indicate a slow
>>> build for
>>> what's there right now, so maybe either sunrise to noon or noon to
>>> sunset until
>>> more complete.
>>> Or am I overthinking this? ;)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> No, dawn to dusk would be my preference.
>> A good days work. :-)
>>
>
> With a pause at noon surely? The man needs to eat! ;-)
>
Only mad dogs and Englishmen go out in the midday sun. Sorry. :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13-2-2017 9:37, Stephen wrote:
> On 2/13/2017 7:55 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 13-2-2017 0:47, Stephen wrote:
>>> On 2/12/2017 9:49 PM, omniverse wrote:
>>>> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>>>>> On 2/12/2017 7:39 PM, omniverse wrote:
>>>>>> Looks good! Sure helps add fluidity having movement... hey, a
>>>>>> thought...
>>>>>
>>>>> And a slight movement in the sky would help with a sense of "time
>>>>> going by".
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, good idea, makes me think time lapse photography to get a real
>>>> sense of
>>>> actual build time. Although sunrise to sunset would indicate a slow
>>>> build for
>>>> what's there right now, so maybe either sunrise to noon or noon to
>>>> sunset until
>>>> more complete.
>>>> Or am I overthinking this? ;)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> No, dawn to dusk would be my preference.
>>> A good days work. :-)
>>>
>>
>> With a pause at noon surely? The man needs to eat! ;-)
>>
>
> Only mad dogs and Englishmen go out in the midday sun. Sorry. :-)
>
>
Nah! in the UK it is always drizzling... :-)
[or was, before climate change...]
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2/13/2017 12:35 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> Nah! in the UK it is always drizzling... :-)
You should know. The Netherlands often gets our leftover weather. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 2017-02-13 08:18, also sprach Stephen:
> On 2/13/2017 12:35 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> Nah! in the UK it is always drizzling... :-)
>
>
> You should know. The Netherlands often gets our leftover weather. ;-)
>
Netherlands second!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELD2AwFN9Nc
--
dik
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
