![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 10 Dec 2000 11:46:40 -0500, ingo wrote:
>Margus Ramst wrote:
>
>>And for example radiosity lit "blue sky" outdoor scenes do tend to look
>>unrealistically blue IMO, so despite my limited knowledge of physics I
>>must assume there is some aspect of natural light behaviour not
>>provided for here.
>
>In the real world there is no direct "colour-bleeding" from the blue sky.
There is, but see below:
>It where nice if it was possible to switch off the lolour of the bleeding
>from the "sky_sphere" in POV.
>
>Photorealism: these blue pictures look as if an outdoor scene was
>photographed with a film suitable for artificial light.
Exactly. Sunlight is a lot more blue (or less red) than artificial
light. The human eye adapts to these differences, but film - or povray -
cannot. Therefore you need different films for indoors and outdoors to
get lighting, which "looks right". Similarly, would need different
settings in povray to simulate the adaptation of the human eye to
different lighting.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Es war nicht Gegenstand der Abstimmung zu
| | | hjp### [at] wsr ac at | Zahlen neu festzulegen.
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Johannes Schwenke <jby### [at] ginko de>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Chris Huff wrote:
>
> In article <Xns### [at] povray org>, ing### [at] home nl (ingo)
> wrote:
>
> > In the real world there is no direct "colour-bleeding" from the blue sky.
>
> I believe you are mistaken...most of the illumination in the shade comes
> from scattered light. And things lit with sky light *do* have a blue
> cast, but your eyes usually adjust to it.
Agreed. Look at shadows on fresh snow.
--
Francois Labreque | Rimmer: "Let's go to red alert!"
flabreque | Kryten: "Are you sure, Sir? You realize it
@ | actually means changing the bulb!"
videotron.ca
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Francois Labreque wrote:
>Look at shadows on fresh snow.
The snow in the shadows has a bluish tint, the rest of the snow is
"white". The general lightning is white, due to atmospheric scattering the
shadow is blue.
When radiosity rendering with a blue sky_sphere it is as if the light is
blue. The snow and the shadow are blue.
This is why I stated: "In the real world there is no direct "colour-
bleeding" from the blue sky", probably needed to put more emphasis on
"direct".
Ingo
--
Photography: http://members.home.nl/ingoogni/
Pov-Ray : http://members.home.nl/seed7/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Margus Ramst <mar### [at] peak edu ee> wrote:
: And for example radiosity lit "blue sky" outdoor scenes do tend to look
: unrealistically blue IMO
That's probably because people tend to make their skies unrealistically
blue and bright.
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |