 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Shawn Fumo wrote in message <382### [at] the-spa com>...
>> Ah, except that I think the Avi could be made with no compression and
later
>> the frames extracted to redo in another way. Again, I have little to no
>> experience with DTA32 and its Avi feature.
>
>Of course in that case, the AVI file would likely be the same size as
>all of the frames seperate anyways, unless you take into account the
>overhead of an OS for storing multiple files.
An uncompressed AVI is approximately 12 percent larger than the total size
of the individual frames.
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The expanse of disk space I have now made me forget about the zip file
option, good thinking Shawn. The down side of course, as is the case for any
option, is the compilation time which increases with each successive frame
addition.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Forget about ZIP and start using RAR...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 7 Nov 1999 13:02:07 -0500, "TonyB"
<ben### [at] panamaphoenixnet> wrote:
>Forget about ZIP and start using RAR...
Yeah, much better compression though quite slower. The good thing
about ZIPs is that they are cross-platform. Also, there are many
utilities that treat ZIPs as directories, so if you make an empty ZIP
and set it to be the output directory for POV...
Peter Popov
ICQ: 15002700
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I find RAR to be as fast, if not faster, than ZIP. What version are you
using?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
