POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Cupid's Feed [link to adult themed image] : Re: Cupid's Feed [link to adult themed image] Server Time
11 Aug 2024 17:18:54 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Cupid's Feed [link to adult themed image]  
From: IMBJR
Date: 3 Apr 2004 08:35:25
Message: <pjft60dnarl5eaaagn7f827crmdi9j9ev8@4ax.com>
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 15:59:41 -0500, Jim Charter <jrc### [at] msncom>
wrote:

>IMBJR wrote:
>
>> 
>> 
>> Just because you expect it, does not mean it was not a stuggle.
>> 
>You think you create a struggle for me?  Your posture is hardly new, 
>quite understandable, but no longer very credible to me.  Expression, 
>creative or otherwise, does not exist outside of a discourse to derive 
>meaning from, and a receiver to be subject to that meaning.  If you deny 
>that necessity then my question to you remains, what are you showing 
>your work to us for?  My own answer is that you do not want to accept 
>its dependency on an audience and that all audiences are local. And 
>therefore you are not being totally honest with yourself.
>
>I submit to you that learning to accept this sometimes dreary fact is 
>what is the struggle.
>
>But you hide behind your passive-aggressive "posting policy" and your 
>secretly encoded signature.

There's that pass-aggressive double-talk again. tut!

As for secretly-encoded, I reveled the code.

>
>> Mmm, obviously something up there. After all, I'm not doing any
>> charging.
>>
>I've asked the question before, that's all.
>
>> 
>> As for the nick name "nonsense" that you yawn at, please give me an
>> example of where else you have seen that technique used to derive a
>> word.
>> 
>
>My daughter comes home with various schoolyard games that involve 
>assigning numbers to letters, applying some calculation then reassigning 
>letters to the result.  Other simple encryption technics might involve 
>laying out some schema then reparsing it in some other way.  But what 
>makes me yawn is the general posture of secreting away content with a 
>private method of encoding, hinting at the notion of entropy, and all 
>with the conceit that no one else gets it.  It's neither bad nor good, 
>valid nor invalid, but you find it often enough in the artworld.  Sorry 
>if I let my scorn show.  But you claim not to care how people respond.

So what?

I don't care. 

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.