|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:22:12 +0200, Eric CHAPUZOT wrote:
> as had said Fabien Mosen, we discussed for more than 5 years on this
> problem on news.zoo-logique.org
Different server, different rules.
> they've even make a special group for that on a funny demand. they
> called it "chapuzot.zoo"
> but nobody comes to post.
Looks like it was created for you - but I don't see the problem with
posting links to higher quality images - I really don't.
> it could be interesting for povray animations which need better quality
> very very often...
When subscribing to a group with a title of 'binaries.animations', it's
pretty obvious the files are going to be of a significant size. When
subscribing to an 'images' group, it's not clear what the average size is.
I would think that you'd *want* people to be interested in your images,
not pissed off because it took longer than expected to download them over
their 26.4Kbps dialup. I know if I was stuck with a slow dialup (which
would've been less than 5 years ago), I'd be *very* unhappy with the waste
of my limited bandwidth.
So again, I ask, what's so difficult about being considerate for those
less fortunate?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |