Heh, my last render that I did took over 17 hours! Makes me really want
PVMPov or MPIPov to be release for 3.5 or 3.6 :) It's amazing how much
faster computers have gone...and we're still taking a really long time to
render scenes. The only different? Well they are a whole heck of a lot
better :)

Tim


On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 16:09:32 -0500, Tom A. wrote:

> I was re-reading _Rendezvous With Rama_ and thought I'd render it, to 
> get a feel for the size of the thing.  It's Big.
> 
> (For those who haven't read it - it's a hollow, cylindrical cylinder 
> with an interior 50 km long, and an internal diameter of 16 km.  It 
> rotates to generate artificial gravity against the inner surface.)
> 
> At the airlock end, there are three stairways that go from the base of a 
> km long ladder and follow a mostly hemispherical slope to the flat part 
> of the cylinder.
> 
> I got the end's shape - there are six platforms that cicle the 
> hemispherical slope - and ran a trace() to place steps made of boxes. 
> It generated over 10,000 steps.  The parse went fairly quickly.  Then 
> the render started.
> 
> I'm doing this on a Windows 98 system with an Athelon 2200 (which is 
> equivalent of a 1.2G pentium).  It was rendering 130 pixels per _minute_.
> 
> Needless to say, I pulled the stairway.
> 
> Anyone have a suggestion for a quicker render?
> 
> Tom A.
> 
> (If you haven't read it, I suggest _Rendezvous with Rama_ by A. C. Clarke.)

Post a reply to this message