|
|
And lo on 22 Aug 2004 12:41:35 -0400, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> did
spake, saying:
> Phil Cook <phi### [at] rocainnospamfreeservecouk> wrote:
>> Nope :) Perhaps Switch_Value >= Low_Value
>
> But why? It's the same thing.
>
Because the text reads Low_Value <= Switch_Value, Switch_Value<=High_Value
and the example reads the equivalent of Switch_Value >= Low_Value,
Switch_Value <= High_Value. Yes mathematically they are the same but it's
not consistent grammatically.
--
Phil Cook
--
All thoughts and comments are my own unless otherwise stated and I am
happy to be proven wrong.
Post a reply to this message
|
|