On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 22:44:43 +0200, Shay <nomail@nomail> wrote:

> So, Scientific American is excited about the mental benefits of video  
> games.
> Which video games? Maybe all of them, but the ones being tested are  
> first-person
> shooters. That's a drag, because, in my limited experience, there's no  
> other
> style of video game with less video game in it. I tried Bioshock: not  
> only is it
> almost as much "playing pretend" as it is playing a game, but a decent  
> portion
> of the game you do get to play is a shitty puzzle game. I guess they  
> spent all
> their development time on the graphics.
>
> Are there any actual fps video games (not bedtime stories) available for  
> ps3
> (first choice) or Steam, or did the industry take a permanent wrong turn  
> after
> Doom?
>
> -Shay
>
>

What about Crysis? You can play it any way you like.

Or all those army games? Call of Duty, Battlefield, etc?

I installed Battlefield play4free last week and it was really hectic. I  
got killed 5 times i a row within the first minute. But I'm guessing you  
need higher bandwidth to play multiplayer games.

-- 
-Nekar Xenos-

Post a reply to this message