 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news:2k4est0t32dm5vtdvej12uqi56obmfl6pt@4ax.com...
> Hi none.provided.net, you recently wrote in moray.win:
>
> > Might you take a moment to elaborate on this?
> POV-Ray 3.5 has very many new features that we will not be able to
> support for the next version (time and expense).
>
> Which of those features we will be supporting depends partly on the
> feedback we get and on the complexity of the features.
Could we get a list of features you are thinking about to be supported,
perhaps some easy to implement, and some not so easy but possible,
so we could have a glimpse of Moray's future?
IMHO, that would make things easier.
Bye.
--
Txemi Jendrix
tji### [at] euskalnet net
http://www.geocities.com/txemijendrix
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Txemi Jendrix, you recently wrote in moray.win:
> Could we get a list of features you are thinking about to be supported,
> perhaps some easy to implement, and some not so easy but possible,
> so we could have a glimpse of Moray's future?
But if I do that you will get a wrong impression of Moray's future,
since things that maybe many users would like won't be on that list,
whereas if they sent in their wish by email it might become a reality.
Having said that, I will tell you what we have already implemented:
- photon support (global settings and per object)
- no_image and no_reflection flags
- new radiosity variables
- mesh2 support
- uv mapping (for mesh2, box and sphere, including OpenGL preview).
Markus is working on the Material Editor, so I can't comment on what
he's done so far.
As to what we plan to implement, I won't comment but it is important
that anyone that feels the strong need for a feature should write to
us about it (if he hasn't done so already).
Regards,
- Lutz
email : lut### [at] stmuccom
Web : http://www.stmuc.com/moray
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lutz Kretzschmar <lut### [at] stmuccom> wrote:
: - photon support (global settings and per object)
I suppose that it will also be possible to tune photons in light sources
as well? (Often you need to, for example, turn off photons for a certain
light source.)
--
#macro N(D,I)#if(I<6)cylinder{M()#local D[I]=div(D[I],104);M().5,2pigment{
rgb M()}}N(D,(D[I]>99?I:I+1))#end#end#macro M()<mod(D[I],13)-6,mod(div(D[I
],13),8)-3,10>#end blob{N(array[6]{11117333955,
7382340,3358,3900569407,970,4254934330},0)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Warp, you recently wrote in moray.win:
> I suppose that it will also be possible to tune photons in light sources
> as well?
Yes, so far I only allow reflection and refraction to be turned on for
light_sources. The docs (6.10.3) are not clear about the effect of
'global' and it is not specified in the formal light_photon_block but
used in the example....
Do you think that reflection and refraction is enough for a light
source?
- Lutz
email : lut### [at] stmuccom
Web : http://www.stmuc.com/moray
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lutz Kretzschmar <lut### [at] stmuccom> wrote:
: Do you think that reflection and refraction is enough for a light
: source?
Perhaps also the area_light switch could be good (sometimes you want an
area light to shoot photons as an area light, but sometimes you don't).
--
#macro N(D,I)#if(I<6)cylinder{M()#local D[I]=div(D[I],104);M().5,2pigment{
rgb M()}}N(D,(D[I]>99?I:I+1))#end#end#macro M()<mod(D[I],13)-6,mod(div(D[I
],13),8)-3,10>#end blob{N(array[6]{11117333955,
7382340,3358,3900569407,970,4254934330},0)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Having said that, I will tell you what we have already implemented:
> - photon support (global settings and per object)
Hurrah!
> - mesh2 support
> - uv mapping (for mesh2, box and sphere, including OpenGL preview).
Not sure how much use of those two I'll make, but it can't hurt to have
the option :)
> Markus is working on the Material Editor, so I can't comment on what
> he's done so far.
>
> As to what we plan to implement, I won't comment but it is important
> that anyone that feels the strong need for a feature should write to
> us about it (if he hasn't done so already).
Well I've already written, but it can't hurt to ask here too.
Blobs! Please please please please please?
Bye for now,
Jamie
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Blobs! Please please please please please?
dang forgot about them - hell yes - blobs!!
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Lutz Kretzschmar" <lut### [at] stmuccom> wrote in message
news:itblstsjru01grdrqe60rttencr3v4ij8b@4ax.com...
> The difficulty would not be the function parser, but visualizing the
> surface. Of course, I could just supply an edit box for the and pass
> it verbatim to POV-Ray, but that's asking for trouble....
I'd imagine that trying to code in OpenGL support for that would be a
hellish experience.
-Ian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Lutz Kretzschmar" <lut### [at] stmuccom> wrote in message
news:bhrnst46okvdvutem955oq4pbc1deh4aa3@4ax.com...
> - photon support (global settings and per object)
YEAH!
> - uv mapping (for mesh2, box and sphere, including OpenGL preview).
You rule :-)
I've always wanted to make a scene with some Quake enemies, but could never
piece the textures together right...
-Ian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
anoop wrote:
>
> ...
> mmm...actually, the best at this stage, would probably be 3ds import
> in Moray mdl form. But, I think, Baier is already working on that.
Many 3ds files can be directly imported into Moray using my mesh plugin
look in "downloads" at http://xan-der.tripod.com
Xander
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
