 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Thanks for the great feedback. I'll make sure we think about all your
> points. One of them is already in the next version (the Material
> Editor and Library cache the textures).
Hurrah! psychic Lutz !
Rick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > object masking would be essential as well, meaning the ability from
within
> > moray to turn of parts of the scene, replacing them with a single large
> > bounding box.
>
> You can do that. A nice addition to the current capability would be to
> have layers.
damn, i knew i missed something! - yes and layers :)
Rick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rick <pov### [at] dial pipexcom> wrote in article <3846a0f6@news.povray.org>...
> A simpler plugin system (as discussed on sdk-list) would be a real
> advantage, something allong the lines of beginner VB would be perfect -
draw
> your UI then write simple and easy to learn code to power it.
For christ's sake, not VB - that's a horrible
travesty of a programming language. It's not even
object-oriented!
> the ability to parse POV script would be a
> real step forward - even a limited subset of the full language would be
> extremly usefull
I wrote a grammar for a subset of POV using
a Java parser called JavaCC. I use it to turn POV models
(output from Moray) into nested objects that I can combine
and manipulate and then turn back into POV format. It
works fine but I'd like a formal description of POV language -
does such exist?
David
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> It works fine but I'd like a formal description of POV language -
> does such exist?
No.
--
Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > A simpler plugin system (as discussed on sdk-list) would be a real
> > advantage, something allong the lines of beginner VB would be perfect -
> draw
> > your UI then write simple and easy to learn code to power it.
>
>
> For christ's sake, not VB - that's a horrible
> travesty of a programming language. It's not even
> object-oriented!
Err, i think you will find it is, and remeber i was refering for a plugin
language for the masses, if VB was a little quicker, and didnt require
runtimes, nobody would bother with VC. (except maybe from the hard asses who
browse the web with a text based browser)
Rick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rick <pov### [at] dialpipexcom> wrote in article <387325fa@news.povray.org>...
> > VB is not even object-oriented!
> Err, i think you will find it is
No, it's not, because it has
no Inheritance.
If you want reasons why I called it 'horrible'
I could write a much longer reply, but this is not the
correct newsgroup.
>, and remeber i was refering for a plugin
> language for the masses
Well, VB won't do anything for
the Linux masses.
David
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rick <pov### [at] dialpipexcom> wrote in message
news:387325fa@news.povray.org...
> > > A simpler plugin system (as discussed on sdk-list) would be a real
> > > advantage, something allong the lines of beginner VB would be
perfect -
> > draw
> > > your UI then write simple and easy to learn code to power it.
> >
> >
> > For christ's sake, not VB - that's a horrible
> > travesty of a programming language. It's not even
> > object-oriented!
>
> Err, i think you will find it is, and remeber i was refering for a plugin
> language for the masses, if VB was a little quicker, and didnt require
> runtimes, nobody would bother with VC.
No, not really. As long as I have the choice of using Java or C++, I
wouldn't want to program in VB if it was super fast and I was being beaten
with a stick if I didn't. I only would do it for money. Much money. :-)
Johannes.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"David Byrden" <Dav### [at] byrdencomspampreventer> wrote in message
news:01bf5777$b0dc1000$be8391c2@goyra...
> Rick <pov### [at] dialpipexcom> wrote in article
<387325fa@news.povray.org>...
> Well, VB won't do anything for
> the Linux masses.
>
Err, well, that's kinda a moot point, as Moray doesn't do a whole lot for
the Linux masses, either. Actually, Moray is the reason I switched back to
the wunderful world o' Windows :P There were a few other reasons, but I
simply couldn't find a *nix based modeller that could touch Morays
capabilities and ease of use, and I doubt Lutz has any plans on porting it
any time soon (Matter of fact, I believe I would be shot if I seriously
suggested/expected him to :) )
Krystian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Well, VB won't do anything for
> the Linux masses.
who cares - they cannot run Moray anyhow!!!!
Rick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rick <pov### [at] dialpipexcom> wrote:
:> Well, VB won't do anything for
:> the Linux masses.
: who cares
This is the typical attitude...
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
