 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rick [Kitty5] <ric### [at] kitty5 com> wrote:
: it needs 64, it like more
Hmm... Somehow I don't like the idea of spending 64 Megs of my expensive
memory for the OS alone. I could use that memory for more useful things.
--
#macro N(D,I)#if(I<6)cylinder{M()#local D[I]=div(D[I],104);M().5,2pigment{
rgb M()}}N(D,(D[I]>99?I:I+1))#end#end#macro M()<mod(D[I],13)-6,mod(div(D[I
],13),8)-3,10>#end blob{N(array[6]{11117333955,
7382340,3358,3900569407,970,4254934330},0)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On topic to the original thread :o) my stinking site
has changed to the one below... Tweener is still
there, of course.
Back to the windows discussion... ;o) (in a DOS group)
--
CG images, *obscure* home-brewed graphics utils
and animation http://www.users.qwest.net/~dearmad
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
After reviewing all the above recent posts, they only serve to bolster
my decision to more over to light side of the force, i.e. Linux. I will
sitll keep my old workhorse 486 running
DOS 6.22 and (sometimes, Win 3.1). Ant to those who may ask, yes I have
worked with Win2000, and, yes, it is the best of the lot, but that
dosn't do anything to ease my dis-ease with Microsoft.
Ken Matassa
--
+-----------------------------------------+
| If I can't see it, it can't get me! |
+-----------------------------------------+
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Hmm... Somehow I don't like the idea of spending 64 Megs of my expensive
> memory for the OS alone. I could use that memory for more useful things.
memory isn't that expensive, its halved in price since I last bought some -
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
Hi-Impact database driven web site design & e-commerce
TEL : +44 (01625) 266358 - FAX : +44 (01625) 611913 - ICQ : 15776037
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rick [Kitty5]" <ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote in message
news:3b25da3c@news.povray.org...
> Hay! - we should change the subject as there is at least 3 of us - our own
> private group perhaps?
LOL :-)
> > Windows 2000 runs with 128MB, which is almost like a standard. My
friend
> > had it running nicely on 64MB. It's hard to find a system that comes
with
> > less than 128MB, because applications need the space!
>
> I have it running with 256 here, it really makes a big difference and i
> would not concider using less.
Yeah, I have 256MB now, too. I'm just saying that it runs real nice with
128.
> > And I would _not_ trust a company server to a 386 with 2MB of RAM.
Maybe
> a
> > 486 ;-)
>
> I would - those old 386 boxes will plug along (slowly) for years - and
they
> make great linux firewalls
Slowly is right :-)
-Ian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:3b26152e@news.povray.org...
> Rick [Kitty5] <ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote:
> : it needs 64, it like more
>
> Hmm... Somehow I don't like the idea of spending 64 Megs of my expensive
> memory for the OS alone. I could use that memory for more useful things.
Expensive?? Memory's not that bad!
-Ian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:04:52 +0100, "Rick [Kitty5]" <ric### [at] kitty5com>
wrote:
>> Hmm... Somehow I don't like the idea of spending 64 Megs of my expensive
>> memory for the OS alone. I could use that memory for more useful things.
>
>memory isn't that expensive, its halved in price since I last bought some -
Where I live, some people have to vegetate for three months with this
much money. My significant other, for example.
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
paid professional vegetators?? Where DO you live???
Peter Popov wrote:
<snip>
>
> Where I live, some people have to vegetate for three months with this
> much money. My significant other, for example.
>
> Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
> Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
> TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:06:45 -0700, Dearmad <dea### [at] qwestnet> wrote:
>paid professional vegetators?? Where DO you live???
Bulgaria.
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
