"Rick [Kitty5]" <ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote in message
news:3b25da3c@news.povray.org...
> Hay! - we should change the subject as there is at least 3 of us - our own
> private group perhaps?

LOL :-)

> > Windows 2000 runs with 128MB, which is almost like a standard.  My
friend
> > had it running nicely on 64MB.  It's hard to find a system that comes
with
> > less than 128MB, because applications need the space!
>
> I have it running with 256 here, it really makes a big difference and i
> would not concider using less.

Yeah, I have 256MB now, too.  I'm just saying that it runs real nice with
128.

> > And I would _not_ trust a company server to a 386 with 2MB of RAM.
Maybe
> a
> > 486 ;-)
>
> I would - those old 386 boxes will plug along (slowly) for years - and
they
> make great linux firewalls

Slowly is right :-)

-Ian

Post a reply to this message