 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nieminen Juha wrote:
>
> I would _really_ like to see a moray.unix newsgroup some day...
Me too! I'm installing SuSE Linux 6.1 right now and plan to leave Win
3.1 in the dust. (Not wanting to infect my system with later versions O
Microsoft's bug ridden bloat ware, I have fortunatly missed the Win
95/98 experiance.) I'm wishing real hard for a Linux port of Moray.
Ken Matassa
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken Matassa <kma### [at] pacbell net> wrote in message
news:37E### [at] pacbellnet...
> (Not wanting to infect my system with later versions O
> Microsoft's bug ridden bloat ware, I have fortunatly missed the Win
> 95/98 experiance.)
I'm still wondering how you can know that Windows 95/98 is bloatware and a
piece of crap if you've never tried it on your own systems. I've had the
same views with it, ya know, running DOS and Win3.1, until I saw that it ran
better on my system then it did on my dad's.
Just for the note, I had a malfunctioning 486 DX2 80 (it was accidentally
overclocked for over three years) and Windows 95 worked perfect, even in
turbo mode, and on a 486 DX4 100 (they are BOTH AMDs), it was working O.K.,
but not perfect.
--
This message brought to you by:
-=< Ian (the### [at] hotmailcom >=-
Please visit my site at http://spectere2000.cjb.net! :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ian Burgmyer <the### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
: but not perfect.
You said it.
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nieminen Juha <war### [at] punarastascstutfi> wrote in message
news:3869da1c@news.povray.org...
> Ian Burgmyer <the### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> : but not perfect.
>
> You said it.
Heh. That 486 DX4 100 is currently my mom's computer (was my dad's way back
when) and currently, we discovered (per my suggestion) that it runs Win98
better then Win95. Kwel. Now she can play FreeCell with a cool titlebar
gradient! w00! :)
--
This message brought to you by:
-=< Ian (the### [at] hotmailcom >=-
Please visit my site at http://spectere2000.cjb.net! :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ian Burgmyer wrote:
>
> Ken Matassa <kma### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
> news:37E### [at] pacbellnet...
> > (Not wanting to infect my system with later versions O
> > Microsoft's bug ridden bloat ware, I have fortunatly missed the Win
> > 95/98 experiance.)
>
> I'm still wondering how you can know that Windows 95/98 is bloatware and a
> piece of crap if you've never tried it on your own systems. I've had the
> same views with it, ya know, running DOS and Win3.1, until I saw that it ran
> better on my system then it did on my dad's.
>
> Just for the note, I had a malfunctioning 486 DX2 80 (it was accidentally
> overclocked for over three years) and Windows 95 worked perfect, even in
> turbo mode, and on a 486 DX4 100 (they are BOTH AMDs), it was working O.K.,
> but not perfect.
>
> --
> This message brought to you by:
> -=< Ian (the### [at] hotmailcom >=-
>
> Please visit my site at http://spectere2000.cjb.net! :)
I have experiance with both Win95 and Win98 at work, as well a slots of
input from others who use one or the other, incuding both my dad and
sister. (Just got back from visiting them over New Year's in nother
Califonia.) My experiance has been tha Windows locks up if you look at
it cross eyed. My system at home is a 486 DX-2 66 with 64 mg og ram. I
am getting ready to put Linux on it.
Ken Matassa
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eh, at least it's Y2K compliant. :P (check your date settings!)
--
This message brought to you by:
-=< Ian (the### [at] hotmailcom >=-
Please visit my site at http://spectere2000.cjb.net! :)
Ken Matassa <kma### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
news:12D### [at] pacbellnet...
> Ian Burgmyer wrote:
> >
> > Ken Matassa <kma### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
> > news:37E### [at] pacbellnet...
> > > (Not wanting to infect my system with later versions O
> > > Microsoft's bug ridden bloat ware, I have fortunatly missed the Win
> > > 95/98 experiance.)
> >
> > I'm still wondering how you can know that Windows 95/98 is bloatware and
a
> > piece of crap if you've never tried it on your own systems. I've had
the
> > same views with it, ya know, running DOS and Win3.1, until I saw that it
ran
> > better on my system then it did on my dad's.
> >
> > Just for the note, I had a malfunctioning 486 DX2 80 (it was
accidentally
> > overclocked for over three years) and Windows 95 worked perfect, even in
> > turbo mode, and on a 486 DX4 100 (they are BOTH AMDs), it was working
O.K.,
> > but not perfect.
> >
> > --
> > This message brought to you by:
> > -=< Ian (the### [at] hotmailcom >=-
> >
> > Please visit my site at http://spectere2000.cjb.net! :)
> I have experiance with both Win95 and Win98 at work, as well a slots of
> input from others who use one or the other, incuding both my dad and
> sister. (Just got back from visiting them over New Year's in nother
> Califonia.) My experiance has been tha Windows locks up if you look at
> it cross eyed. My system at home is a 486 DX-2 66 with 64 mg og ram. I
> am getting ready to put Linux on it.
>
> Ken Matassa
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken Matassa <kma### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
> Nieminen Juha wrote:
>>
>> I would _really_ like to see a moray.unix newsgroup some day...
> Me too! I'm installing SuSE Linux 6.1 right now and plan to leave Win
> 3.1 in the dust. (Not wanting to infect my system with later versions O
> Microsoft's bug ridden bloat ware, I have fortunatly missed the Win
> 95/98 experiance.) I'm wishing real hard for a Linux port of Moray.
Yes, Linux is realy state of the art OS, and support is realy great, and
well, yes, you need to compile the kerlnel, and, well, no, we don't have
Word'n'stuff for linux, we do have TeX, you know, TeX is realy neat once
you get used to it...
Linux... gimme a break...
Mike
--
"I can do it quick. I can do it cheap. I can do it well. Pick any two."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mario Splivalo <maj### [at] flysrkferhr> wrote:
: Yes, Linux is realy state of the art OS, and support is realy great, and
: well, yes, you need to compile the kerlnel
I didn't have to, when I installed redhat in my computer.
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You don't have to compile the kernal unless you have some weard hardware
that isn't suppoprted. with all distrabutions today, the kernal is
already for use.
Ken Matassa
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 17:06:46 -0700, Ken Matassa <kma### [at] pacbellnet>
wrote:
>You don't have to compile the kernal unless you have some weard hardware
>that isn't suppoprted. with all distrabutions today, the kernal is
>already for use.
The kernel shouild always be compiled to get the most out of your
hardware.
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
