IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> writes:

> On 08 Mar 2004 06:43:50 +0200, Artis Rozentals <art### [at] aaaapollolv>
> wrote:
> 
> >This one has distracting artifacts. I suggest adjusting image size,
> >color depth, compression algorithms, and compression options for each
> >case, instead of an "99kB, 48bpp JPEG2000" fits all approach.
> 
> Better than JPEG though.

You keep claiming that, but I yet I have to see any improvement, blame
it on my 24bit display configuration if you like. All I see are 99kB
posts where 50kB would have been enough.

-- 
http://arose.hopto.org

Post a reply to this message