On 13 Jun 2009 12:22:20 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>I would concur.
>
>Maybe the way to approach it is to use three different scores that are 
>weighted differently (OK, I'm stealing an idea from the scoring 
>methodology for Iron Chef America here).
>
>In ICA, they use three scores - taste, plating, and originality.  Taste 
>is weighted 10 points, the other two are 5 points each.
>
>With IRTC, it seems to me that the three categories might be something 
>like "concept", "technical", and perhaps "realization" - the last one 
>being how well the concept + technical is realized in the final image.  
>The first two could be weighted to be of lower importance (but important 
>to the overall end result) and the last one is the "taste" (if you will) 
>- how well the concept and technical components come together.
>

Or then just give the highest scores to the ones you like the best ;)

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message