Hello!

>Ingo Guenther (ing### [at] REMOVEnetcolognede) wrote:
>: way it is. Maybe 2.5 runs in a DOS emulation under linux, never tried this,
>: but you would drop a lot of cool stuff that came with 2.0.
>
>  Oh... is there more things in version 2.0 than in 2.5? How's that? Is the
>version number going backwards?

3.0, of course - funny that there are still people giggling about a typo...
;)


Bye,
   Ingo.

Post a reply to this message