 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Christian Froeschlin
Subject: Re: Discover more to... IRTC and Cooliris
Date: 17 Jan 2009 16:00:52
Message: <49724704$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Carlo C. wrote:
> My intention was to give a sprinkling of web2.0 to IRTC.
Maybe this process could start with something more
established, such as an RSS feed notifying about new
contests - and showing off the winners, of course ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
They're watching you, Carlo C..
>
> A small idea ... (yet!)
> http://www.cooliris.com/
> To make most captivating views of the images.
> What do you say?
>
I'll say :
"Cooliris is not supported on this browser."
> It is easy to implement.
>
So what...
Slawek
--
________
_/ __/ __/ Idioto! Najpierw rabujesz, a dopiero potem podpalasz!
\__ \__ \_______________________________________________________________
/___/___/ Slawomir Szczyrba steev/AT/hot\dot\pl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <tDOTdegroot@interDOTnlANOTHERDOTnet> wrote:
>
> Don't worry, you make yourself very well understood. I wish I could do the
> same in Italian (which I can read more or less) :-|
>
> Thomas
vecchio e in declino...
Hallo!
--
Carlo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christian Froeschlin <chr### [at] chrfr de> wrote:
> Carlo C. wrote:
>
> > My intention was to give a sprinkling of web2.0 to IRTC.
>
> Maybe this process could start with something more
> established, such as an RSS feed notifying about new
> contests - and showing off the winners, of course ;)
In fact it is inappropriate (much) to say web2.0.
Indeed, this is RSS, MediaRSS for Cooliris.
I agree on the RSS feed.
Ciao Christian
--
Carlo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
=?UTF-8?Q?S=C5=82awomir?= Szczyrba <cre### [at] ofthenight> wrote:
> They're watching you, Carlo C..
> >
> > A small idea ... (yet!)
> > http://www.cooliris.com/
> > To make most captivating views of the images.
> > What do you say?
> >
> I'll say :
> "Cooliris is not supported on this browser."
>
> > It is easy to implement.
> >
> So what...
>
> Slawek
> --
> ________
> _/ __/ __/ Idioto! Najpierw rabujesz, a dopiero potem podpalasz!
> \__ \__ \_______________________________________________________________
> /___/___/ Slawomir Szczyrba steev/AT/hot\dot\pl
Ok for Firefox, Safari, IE :
http://www.cooliris.com/download-all.php
You *surf* with Opera? ;-)
Obviously it is not anything important and it is only an *option* to display
image galleries. :-)
--
Carlo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
BOFH excuse 156: Zombie processes haunting Carlo C.
>
> Ok for Firefox, Safari, IE :
> http://www.cooliris.com/download-all.php
> You *surf* with Opera? ;-)
>
Whatever.
Cooliris doesn't work under linux anyway :>
Slawek
--
________
_/ __/ __/ Fnord.
\__ \__ \_______________________________________________________________
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
=?UTF-8?Q?S=C5=82awomir?= Szczyrba <cre### [at] ofthenight> wrote:
> BOFH excuse 156: Zombie processes haunting Carlo C.
> >
> > Ok for Firefox, Safari, IE :
> > http://www.cooliris.com/download-all.php
> > You *surf* with Opera? ;-)
> >
> Whatever.
> Cooliris doesn't work under linux anyway :>
>
> Slawek
> --
> ________
> _/ __/ __/ Fnord.
> \__ \__ \_______________________________________________________________
Oops, Argh, I forgot Linux!
Excuse me, today is sunday, and I'm still sleeping...
--
Carlo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Carlo C." <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>
> My intention was to give a sprinkling of web2.0 to IRTC.
> My intention was to try *personal pleasure*(1) (perhaps amusement) to view
> images with Cooliris.
>
The one thing I'd strongly object to here is the use of "web 2.0" to mean
splashy bells and whistles and use of Flash. Flickr could possibly be said to
be the first Web 2.0 site, at least in its first implementation. Back when you
could "Blog This!" on a photo without worrying about getting sued, Flickr was
about user-generation and SHARING of content. (Ham-fisted professional
photographers later invaded and sort of ruined the whole 2.0 thing.)
Making raytracing "Web 2.0" would have more to do with sharing of include files
like the povlib.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"gregjohn" <pte### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> "Carlo C." <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> >
> > My intention was to give a sprinkling of web2.0 to IRTC.
> > My intention was to try *personal pleasure*(1) (perhaps amusement) to view
> > images with Cooliris.
> >
>
> The one thing I'd strongly object to here is the use of "web 2.0" to mean
> splashy bells and whistles and use of Flash. Flickr could possibly be said to
> be the first Web 2.0 site, at least in its first implementation. Back when you
> could "Blog This!" on a photo without worrying about getting sued, Flickr was
> about user-generation and SHARING of content. (Ham-fisted professional
> photographers later invaded and sort of ruined the whole 2.0 thing.)
>
> Making raytracing "Web 2.0" would have more to do with sharing of include files
> like the povlib.
I deny what I wrote before.
I have already disillusioned with Cooliris. ;-)
I think the important thing is the return of IRTC, in any form.
.... And the silence of David Buck worries me.
--
Carlo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4/20/2009 12:39 AM, Carlo C. wrote:
> .... And the silence of David Buck worries me.
Not me.
Sometimes, no news is good news. (Of course, sometimes no news is bad
news, but that's beside the point).
Anyway, I assume that he's a busy guy, and that he's probably held up on
something with work. I'm just excited enough at the prospect of the
IRTC returning that I'm not worrying about when it happens (as long as
its within a year or two, of course!).
--
...Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
