 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Markus Altendorff
Subject: TC-RTC: my upload's done, with 12 hours to spare :)
Date: 30 Aug 2007 18:51:11
Message: <46d749df$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
... and if anyone's curious as to what the non-scaled-down
version looks like, there's a 720x360 30-megabyte MP-4 file at:
http://wip.anthrosphinx.de/episode010/maal_tbr.mp4
Bracing myself for any kind of comments now... :S
-M
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Markus Altendorff" <maa### [at] anthrosphinx de> wrote in message
news:46d749df$1@news.povray.org...
:o) You know, I had the most horrible time trying to view your
animation last night Markus. Not your fault, Windows. ;) Or rather, I should
say Media Player's. When I clicked on the thumb and MP10 came up, it
immediately gave me some kind of codec error. "Hmm... What gives?" I
thought. "Nope, it's not gonna play." And then out of the blue came another
message that an upgrade to MP11 was available, so I tried that, and nope,
that didn't work either! And more to the point, the others didn't also.
Oops, what to do, what to do... Well, in the end I just rolled back to MP10
and they all worked again. Hmm. <scratches head>
> Bracing myself for any kind of comments now... :S
Well, let's just say that my hassle with MP was worth it. :o)
~Steve~
>
> -M
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Markus Altendorff
Subject: Re: TC-RTC: my upload's done, with 12 hours to spare :)
Date: 31 Aug 2007 07:15:18
Message: <46d7f846$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> "Markus Altendorff" <maa### [at] anthrosphinxde> wrote in message
> news:46d749df$1@news.povray.org...
>
> :o) You know, I had the most horrible time trying to view your
> animation last night Markus. Not your fault, Windows. ;) Or rather, I should
> say Media Player's. When I clicked on the thumb and MP10 came up, it
> immediately gave me some kind of codec error. "Hmm... What gives?" I
> thought. "Nope, it's not gonna play." And then out of the blue came another
> message that an upgrade to MP11 was available, so I tried that, and nope,
> that didn't work either! And more to the point, the others didn't also.
> Oops, what to do, what to do... Well, in the end I just rolled back to MP10
> and they all worked again. Hmm. <scratches head>
That's why i keep a copy of VideoLANclient (videolan.org) at hand. I'm
always wondering why Quicktime seems to have a different kind of
brightness correction for each and every codec - JPEG intermediate files
seemed OK viewed "standalone", then too dark in the video editor (while
looking OK in freeze-frame mode!), then the final video was too bright
after converting to MPEG-4, then again OK as MPEG-1, but washed out when
VideoLAN's display brightness didn't jump around nearly as much...
>
>> Bracing myself for any kind of comments now... :S
>
> Well, let's just say that my hassle with MP was worth it. :o)
Heh. Thanks, nice to hear :) Did you check out JvS's Rusty #33? Now THAT
is excellent video quality! And i couldn't help but chuckle at the blue
robot "running away" in the end :)
-M
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
