POV-Ray : Newsgroups : irtc.animations : Next topic, anyone? Server Time
23 Nov 2024 19:07:08 EST (-0500)
  Next topic, anyone? (Message 1 to 10 of 11)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 1 Messages >>>
From: Roberto Amorim
Subject: Next topic, anyone?
Date: 16 Apr 2004 14:08:10
Message: <4080210a$1@news.povray.org>
Any ideas? I need some time to think...

I tried looking for any hints on ftp.irtc.org, but to no avail.

Regards,

Roberto


Post a reply to this message

From: Tek
Subject: Re: Next topic, anyone?
Date: 17 Apr 2004 02:43:29
Message: <4080d211$1@news.povray.org>
"Roberto Amorim" <wol### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:4080210a$1@news.povray.org...
> Any ideas? I need some time to think...
>
> I tried looking for any hints on ftp.irtc.org, but to no avail.

I have a bunch of ideas for an animation, but I need to know the topic to choose
which one to do!

I guess the admins are busy, hopefully the topic will be announced this
weekend...

-- 
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Tom Galvin
Subject: Re: Next topic, anyone?
Date: 17 Apr 2004 10:59:35
Message: <Xns94CE6FD064150tomatimporg@203.29.75.35>
"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in news:4080d211$1@news.povray.org:


> 
> I guess the admins are busy, hopefully the topic will be announced
> this weekend...
> 

Dancing


-- 
Tom
_________________________________
The Internet Movie Project
http://www.imp.org/


Post a reply to this message

From: John VanSickle
Subject: Re: Next topic, anyone?
Date: 17 Apr 2004 11:25:15
Message: <40814C58.BE35A12@hotmail.com>
Tom Galvin wrote:
> 
> "Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in news:4080d211$1@news.povray.org:
> 
> >
> > I guess the admins are busy, hopefully the topic will be announced
> > this weekend...
> >
> 
> Dancing

Looks like another small round...

Regards,
John


Post a reply to this message

From: Tom Galvin
Subject: Re: Next topic, anyone?
Date: 17 Apr 2004 11:47:10
Message: <Xns94CE77E123678tomatimporg@203.29.75.35>
John VanSickle <evi### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in news:40814C58.BE35A12
@hotmail.com:


>> 
>> Dancing
> 
> Looks like another small round...
> 
> 


Rusty ala hampsterdance?


-- 
Tom
_________________________________
The Internet Movie Project
http://www.imp.org/


Post a reply to this message

From: Tek
Subject: Re: Next topic, anyone?
Date: 17 Apr 2004 14:56:10
Message: <40817dca$1@news.povray.org>
"John VanSickle" <evi### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:408### [at] hotmailcom...
> Tom Galvin wrote:
> >
> > Dancing
>
> Looks like another small round...

I wouldn't be so cynical. I think this topic has enough "What the ****?!" appeal
to attract a lot of entrants. Whereas the last topic was quite intimidating,
this one sounds nice and innocent so lots of people who might ordinarily decide
they can't commit enough time to do a really good entry (that's my usual
excuse!) may come out of their shells a little more and just experiment, since
they don't expect any serious competition this round.

That's on the one hand. On the other hand: I really can't think of any ideas!
Well, I have one but it needs good character animation and I've never done that!
:)

Anyway, changing subject slightly, isn't it a bit wierd to have a "Dancing"
competition where we have to judge without listening to the audio track?

-- 
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com


Post a reply to this message

From: gregjohn
Subject: Re: Next topic, anyone?
Date: 17 Apr 2004 15:10:00
Message: <web.4081808a58affc4e3a5fb9ba0@news.povray.org>
Tom, what happened to IMP this round?  While poking around the site, I
thought I once saw a draft of a truly unique take on the SciFi concept.



Tom Galvin <tom### [at] imporg> wrote:


Post a reply to this message

From: John VanSickle
Subject: Re: Next topic, anyone?
Date: 17 Apr 2004 18:21:58
Message: <4081AE02.2C8CEEB5@hotmail.com>
Tom Galvin wrote:
> 
> John VanSickle <evi### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in news:40814C58.BE35A12
> @hotmail.com:
> 
> >>
> >> Dancing
> >
> > Looks like another small round...
> 
> Rusty ala hampsterdance?

No, but something more in line with his physical limitations.

And while I was at my daughter's ballet class, an idea involving
the Greb in a non-humourous way came to mind.

Regards,
John


Post a reply to this message

From: Markus Altendorff
Subject: Re: Next topic, anyone?
Date: 18 Apr 2004 04:44:02
Message: <40823fd2@news.povray.org>
Tek wrote:

> I wouldn't be so cynical. I think this topic has enough "What the ****?!" appeal
> to attract a lot of entrants. Whereas the last topic was quite intimidating,
> this one sounds nice and innocent so lots of people who might ordinarily decide
> they can't commit enough time to do a really good entry (that's my usual
> excuse!) may come out of their shells a little more and just experiment, since
> they don't expect any serious competition this round.

And don't forget that dancing involves repeated movements, which 
lend itself well to automated and looping sequences with just 
some camera movements... (did i hear somebody mumble "modern pop 
group/singer casting"? ;-)

Heh, "The Rusty Dancers" - the first automated boy group - no 
wait, wasn't that "Take That" or someone? ;-)

> That's on the one hand. On the other hand: I really can't think of any ideas!
> Well, I have one but it needs good character animation and I've never done that!
> :)

read your first paragraph above again ;-)

> Anyway, changing subject slightly, isn't it a bit wierd to have a "Dancing"
> competition where we have to judge without listening to the audio track?

Well, you could include 5 seconds of "recommended listening: 
<song> by <artist>", then a countdown "5...4...3...2...1... PRESS 
PLAY ON TAPE" - thus keeping out of copyright and other issues...

("Press play on tape" - suddenly, i get this nostalgic 1980's 
Commodore 64 datasette feeling ;-)

-Markus


Post a reply to this message

From: Tek
Subject: Re: Next topic, anyone?
Date: 18 Apr 2004 04:59:54
Message: <4082438a$1@news.povray.org>
"Markus Altendorff" <maa### [at] anthrosphinxde> wrote in message
news:40823fd2@news.povray.org...
> Well, you could include 5 seconds of "recommended listening:
> <song> by <artist>", then a countdown "5...4...3...2...1... PRESS
> PLAY ON TAPE" - thus keeping out of copyright and other issues...

Ah, but I'm referring to the judging, not the copyright issue. The judges are
supposed to view animations without sound (unless the rules have changed since
last time I read them).

-- 
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 1 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.