On Fri, 14 Jun 2002 16:02:00 +0200, "Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trfde>
wrote:
> You should really not read the documentation as a specification because it
> is not and never was meant to be a specification.

I don't. But I want to show points where documentation could be more precise.
Such exception seems strange IMO but if it is intentional design then it is
very easy to find workaround.

ABX

Post a reply to this message