|
 |
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 19:45:45 +0000, Mike Williams <mik### [at] nospam please> wrote:
> Tracking these was a bit of a nightmare because some of them arrived on
> my newserver with completely different subject lines and subtly
> different message ids. I can search my article database by either of
> those fields, or by author
You can always check via www-interface http://news.povray.org/.
It catch thread sometimes better then newsreaders.
> (but you wrote so many!).
I wait for place in Bug Reports Boulevard ;)
> > Crash with redeclared functions
> > http://news.povray.org/q6g83u4egq3ts0m8ip5nkn5lf0ljkacu8g%404ax.com
> > (Thorsten said it is not legal syntax but there is still bug becouse of crash)
>
> Original Subject: crash during function creation in loop
> Isn't this already reported in the thread that Thorsten referred you to?
Thorsten answered to both to point both use not legal syntax. However first
generates crash...
> >Not catched function redeclaration
> >http://news.povray.org/tis83ugh1kcc22h5o6is9qpkv61pjgunc0%404ax.com
> >(Thorsten said it is not catched illegal syntax, perhaps the same job number as
> >above)
>
> Original Subject: can't redefine identifier
> OK
... and second not generates warnings.
That's completly different behaviour.
> > Function declaration and namespace
> > http://news.povray.org/l2ji3uc2k9su99o2gct3n2thgqoq7f4pd5%404ax.com
>
> I got totally confused by this thread, and can't seem to see if anything
> ever actually got confirmed, and if so, what.
For me it is confirmed by Tor in
http://news.povray.org/3C3A373B.2AB132D2%40hotmail.com
> > Wrong highlighting in editor (function_id)
> > http://news.povray.org/jfji3ug1faevn1jk3mlko64sb71ptmmn97%404ax.com
>
> Unconfirmed
Confirmed now in
http://news.povray.org/Xns919716BADF51Dcsbhccse%40204.213.191.226
> > Splines - not working legal statement
> > http://news.povray.org/m7fq3u41ctia9e6i3tbnlstn6ek739vpke%404ax.com
>
> Original Subject: splines - documentation and reality
>
> I'm not logging documentation errors. If there's anything there that's
> not a documentation error, then I believe it's unconfirmed.
It was confirmed (with new code) by the author of spline patch two days befor
your list. See http://news.povray.org/3c3fc5ec%40news.povray.org
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
