Wasn't it ingo who wrote:
>in news:cW9### [at] econymdemoncouk Mike Williams wrote:
>
>> I would prefer to retain the "param.inc" versions of the examples on
>> my Isosurface tutorial page, because they are so much faster than
>> real parametrics. At the moment over half of them fail to run under
>> RC2. 
>> 
>
>Think you misunderstood me, the code was from an newer version of
>param.inc that accepts functions directly and looks even more like the
>parametric object. 

When is that going to become available?

-- 
Mike Williams
Gentleman of Leisure

Post a reply to this message