POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Realistic radiosity (30k) : Re: Realistic radiosity (30k) Server Time
4 Nov 2024 15:13:48 EST (-0500)
  Re: Realistic radiosity (30k)  
From: Peter Popov
Date: 10 Jun 2000 23:20:32
Message: <fn06kso86l6d0c5onls20nk2h92ojt7es2@4ax.com>
On Sat, 10 Jun 2000 23:47:06 +0300, Kari Kivisalo <kar### [at] kivisalonet>
wrote:

>> My only concern is fade_power, shouldn't you use 1000?
> 
>I'm pretty sure that every physics book I have red says 1/r^2.
>You must be thinking about interior fade_power :)

I wouldn't question your physics books because mine read the same
<grin>. It escaped me that realistic attenuation is only suppoted for
object interior. But then, isn't light fading unrealistic in this
case? Can you try placing the whole scene in a transparent object and
using realistic attenuation?


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.