In article <40664075$1@news.povray.org>,
"Greg M. Johnson" <gregj;-)565### [at] aol com> wrote:
> ...is this correct? It's what I'm observing and goes along with what I
> think I understand of the normal process-- just want to see if there's a
> trick to get around it.
It doesn't negate normals, it just doesn't take them into account for
radiosity lighting. Using "normal on" in the radiosity block will cause
it to take the normals into account, giving slower but more accurate
results.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: <chr### [at] tagpovrayorg>
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
