In article <4087c886@news.povray.org>,
 "Tim Nikias v2.0" <#macro timnikias (@) #local = "gmx.net" #end> 
 wrote:

> Is this better? I know, the face still has a few more particles than the
> remaining scene (well, just like about 4000 or so..), but some emphasis
> should still be put on her face and expression, rather than her entire body.
> Your comment was very helpful, I've got to admit that! I've always been
> watching her face and how it makes the smile visible, but sure, the
> remaining body should be almost as visible.

I prefer the original. It had a sense of an invisible person being 
revealed by a gentle rain...this is more like someone getting sprayed in 
the face with a hose. The original just hinted at what was there, this 
one buries it in noise.

-- 
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: <chr### [at] tagpovrayorg>
http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message