In article <38B5EA14.BC81C7D6@aol.com>, "SamuelT." <STB### [at] aolcom> 
wrote:

> I like it! Tricky trace work there. I just recently found out that 
> using just method 2 and eval with a very low accuracy (about .001) 
> gives the best results. I hope to work on my tutorial soon :)

Hmm, actually, that is a pretty high accuracy. :-)
Maybe this keyword should be changed to something like "allowable_error" 
in the official version...
I confess that I haven't tweaked the settings for this isosurface at 
all...it rendered as wanted and wasn't too slow, so I just didn't 
bother. I just typed in the equation, liked the results, gave it a plain 
green pigment, and began playing with trace().

-- 
Chris Huff
e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/

Post a reply to this message