In article <388c922b@news.povray.org>, "TonyB" 
<ben### [at] panamaphoenixnet> wrote:

> You are reffering to translucency. This can only be achieved by using
> blurred transparency available in... what a second... it isn't 
> available...
> oh, Chriiiis...!

Ok, ok. I will fix up a version using a more standard syntax than my 
current patch and post the changed files...when I get the time. :-)
I will put this on my to-do list. I may not have time until the 
weekends, though.

I have released a patch which implements it, but it is an older syntax 
which I have thought of improvements for.

-- 
Chris Huff
e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/

Post a reply to this message