|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
In article <3D5F015C.594862FF@aol.com>, Dave Dunn <poi### [at] aol com>
wrote:
> That is exactly what I was thinking. Since I have finally "come
> around" to using functions, I like them better than plain old pattern
> identifiers anyway, if only for consistency's sake. Now if we only
> had a null pattern identifier to make empy spaces in normal maps, but
> that of course is a different story... ; }
Just specify a solid pattern (a function pattern with a constant value).
Normal perturbation only uses the *change* in a pattern, a constant
pattern won't affect the normal. Try the checkers pattern as a normal
sometime, the normal only changes at the cube boundaries.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlink net>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tag povray org
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |