In article <3AA3D4E2.A405A713@gmx.de>, Christoph Hormann 
<chr### [at] gmxde> wrote:

> but that probably could lead to strange results when the cube structure
> interferes with the pattern.

When the blur distance is larger than the size of the cubes, it doesn't 
blend to a 50-50 mixture of the colors, but gives a bunch of fuzzy 
squares that are larger than the actual pattern. I'm planning a type 3 
that will supersample the voxels before interpolating, which will give 
better results. This will be a true blurring, not the "subsample and 
interpolate" method 2 uses. Also, when I let it use higher resolution 
voxel maps, this won't be a problem.

BTW, method 0 also has this problem...it gives some pretty odd results 
when the distance between samples is larger than the distance between 
cubes. I haven't checked method 1, but it should have this aliasing 
problem as well.

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><

Post a reply to this message