|
 |
In article <B9B1143E.4D9E%fid### [at] artrecognition couk>,
Fidel viegas <fid### [at] artrecognitioncouk> wrote:
> Well, I never played that much with MegaPov. But, now that you have
> mentioned it, what were the reasons that led the team to omit it from
> version 3.5?
Well, as I recall, it never quite worked right and there wasn't
agreement on exactly how it should be done. And maybe the POV Team plans
some better way for 4.0, and didn't want to add an incompatible method
to 3.5.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
